<p>Just wondering which school would be better in the LONG RUN in terms of getting good job fresh out of college, networking/connections, getting into a top MBA program (Ivys, Sloan, Booth, Kellogg etc..)</p>
<p>Background:
-Male
-NYC Resident
-Don't need Financial Aid at all (though scholarships cant hurt)
-Did an okay job in HS, 93 GPA, 1540/1600 SAT (M+CR), many EC's
-Intended Major: Finance or maybe real estate but leaning towards the former
-Future Job Aspirations: (Investment) Banking, Private Equity, Hedge Funds ...
-Accepted to Michigan EA a few days ago
-Applying to Stern (trying to decide whether to do ED II or RD)
-Also applying to WashU, Northwestern, CMU, USC, UCB, UCLA etc.. but I think Stern and Ross are probably the better schools for undergrad business</p>
<p>Current gathered input:</p>
<p>-Stern is very cutthroat and competitive, and it has the "stern curve" which gives only maybe 25% of the class an A, while the majority get B's and Cs
-Ross is less competitive in that manner, and people generally do better than kids at Stern in terms of GPA
-Stern is in the middle of the city so it has better networking, better internship/job opportunities, but the school there gears you toward a more professional route, and the undergrad experience there can be more comparable to an MBA experience there.... this results in wall street companies being packed by "Sternies", but for some reason, Stern somehow only has a 67% job placement according to Businessweek
-Ross is far away from NYC, and people there rely more on On-Campus Recruiting, alumni connections, networking, and travelling to NYC for interviews on your own, supposedly the job placement into these big name banking companies is just as good, though there is no statistical evidence of this, but it seems that Ross has a way higher job placement of 91% according to Businessweek
-The average salary for Ross Graduates is $62,000 first year; its top employers are Deloitte(10 people), Microsoft (8 people), Accenture (8 people), Goldman Sachs (7 people)
-The average salary for Stern Graduates is $62,000 first year; top employers: PWC, Goldman, Ernst & Young, Morgan Stanley
-Ross total costs is about $53,000 a year
-Stern total costs is about $61,000 a year
-Ross has a campus and a traditional campus life/greek life etc
-Stern has no campus, no campus life but it has bars & clubs
-Easy to make friends at Ross
-Hard to make friends at Stern
-Ross is predominantly white males
-Stern is predominantly asian females
-Ross has more lenient grading and less competition, so people generally have better GPAs
-Stern is cutthroat and very competitive and there is a "stern curve" that causes a lot of stress and what not, but people are more prepared for the professional world</p>
<p>Questions:
1. If I want to eventually end up in ibanking or private equity or hedge funds in the future and make some big $$$ in the long run, would Stern or Ross be a better undergraduate option? </p>
<p>Both GENERAL universities are ranked pretty low though, maybe late 20's to 30's, and I'm not sure how that looks in terms of "prestige" in the business world. Would it be better to go to one of these schools, or somewhere like Northwestern or Brown or something? </p>
<ol>
<li><p>Also, which would look better for getting accepted to a top MBA program? (I know schools' names aren't everything but it's definitely at least somewhat considered)</p></li>
<li><p>How much does GPA matter for undergraduate job hiring? Of course it isn't everything, but that's what they told me about college also, like "HS GPA isnt everything, they look at many other parts of your application," but it turns out that my HS GPA is the only thing that is holding me back from the top schools now... I think the real message was "you have to have a high HS GPA, but ALSO excel in other aspects of you application as well", is that the same for jobs? Or is GPA kind of disregarded? </p></li>
<li><p>If I have any misconceptions about anything, please do tell me :)</p></li>
</ol>