<p>Well, I've got Kaplan, 5 steps to a 5, cliffs, Harpercollins college outline, and, a regular senior Econ book, which one should I use?</p>
<p>uh... none of the above. Get PR.</p>
<p>XD That's harsh haha.</p>
<p>For Econs I recommend you study from your notes and purely from your notes (hopefully you have good notes). If not, then get a set of notes that you can look through (maybe borrow from your friends)? If you still can't obtain a good set of notes then I guess use PR. I'm not familiar with Harpercollins college outline, but if it's a good set of notes then go for that.</p>
<p>DO NOT touch your econs textbook. For econs studying off the textbook is going to kill you.</p>
<p>PR. end of story.</p>
<p>I absolutely hated the PR. I felt it was extremely wordy and didn't cover anything important. I would highly not recommend it and you'll be wasting your money if you buy it.</p>
<p>Use the Barron and use the PR as a complement!</p>
<p>any opinion on cliffs?</p>
<p>cliffs- don't use it</p>
<p>Oh good, any thoughts on what I should do with the book (without being destructive)?</p>
<p>wooo...seems time to get PR</p>
<p>I read PR the day before the micro test (the whole micro section was only 80 pgs) and it definitely helped. Get Princeton Review....that seems to be the consensus here.</p>
<p>I would not recommend Princeton's graphs for your actual AP exam. The graphs are poorly explained, over detailed, and the whole book is plain out messy. It's just so poorly organized. I lucked out with a good econ teacher who gave us really good study guides. I tried to use the PR and it was a disaster so I switched to her study guides and I think it worked. If you want a book I would buy Kaplan because it's clear.</p>
<p>PR is good for micro, not good for macro.</p>
<p>^agree, it was also very badly organized for macro, and not enough on fiscal/monetary policies.</p>
<p>For the love of god, do not use Kaplan. That thing had some errors I think and quite a few typos.</p>