Middle 50% SAT Scores Top LACs in 2005

Parent Cafe
41

<p>^^-----^^</p>

<p>It seems that they followed the "correct alphabet" in the printed edition for Vassar and Colby.</p>

42

<p>Okay, more US News anomaly/sloppiness (xiggi should like this one): </p>

<p>2007 US News (class of 2009) lists CMC middle 50% SAT as 1310-1490. </p>

<p>But CB and PR have it as 1270-1480. </p>

<p>And, if you check, you'll find 1310-1490 were the figures in the 2006 US New edition, i.e., the Class of 2008. </p>

<p>Perhaps someone forgot to update?</p>

43

<p>Man! How do you guys catch these things? Oppo research? Sheer anality? Idiot savants?</p>

44

<p>Claremont McKenna also does not make their Common Data Set available to the public (other than page one)--at least not anywhere that I can find it...</p>

45

<br>


<br>

<p>LOL!
JHS, it's August, the shrinks are on vacation. CC obsessives-compulsives in full cry!</p>

46

<p>"Claremont McKenna also does not make their Common Data Set available to the public (other than page one)--at least not anywhere that I can find it..."</p>

<p>No, they don't. Pomona and CMC seem to prefer to publish a profile. A fact that I regret and have openly decried. Publicly available and truthful reporting should be the standard.</p>

47

<p>Maybe, Middlebury is the one school in the whole country that has a class size not divisible by four where the two students on each side of the 75% range don't have the same math score; which would produce a range not ending in 0. Or maybe not...</p>