<p>Coot raises some good points though. The idea is that you don't have to listen to me or my advice. Yes, i've been through the system and am in grad school now. I ment only to give my own opinion, everyones path through life if different, but sometimes people don't realize that the journey can be so much more rewarding than the destination. So i also wanted to clarify some things.</p>
<p>I didn't intend to villify graduating in 3 years. I ment it more as a comment on all actions carrying consequences. If you cram everything into 3 years you miss out on other things. You do. This is just the way it is. Now, if you are the type of person that says, "Who cares! I really want to study math at CalTech with whatever X professor." And if that is your goal, getting out a year early might not a bad thing.</p>
<p>On double majoring. If you happen to know that you want to do something like international finance, of if you know you want to go into patent law, or if you know you want to do something like art conservation, then yes, double majoring will probably help you out. But for the vast majority of people who read boards and never post, a double major wastes time and money. It does give you more insight into new areas though and that can be fun. Someone picked up a second major without much extra effort. That is awesome. Again, i only speak from the sciences point of view where doubling up always incurrs a bunch of extra courses.</p>
<p>Speaking from the sciences standpoint, which i can only do. You get a degree and you get a job. The likelyhood of someone at 45 going, "You know, analytical lab work for pfizer is kind of boring, i want to be a museum curator" isn't that high. Isn't isn't a 0 chance either, somepeople get bored and want to move on. Usually this is done by going back to school to train for a new career. Just because one has a double major doesn't automatically open all the doors you would think. </p>
<p>In terms of success, this can be defined as many different ways. My own personal definition is that if i wake up every day, and generally like my job and enjoy my day, can pay all my bills and put food on my table every week, then i consider that success. I don't hold anyone but myself to this standard. My roommate thinks that is pathetic of me. She believes that success is defined as a combination between making a lot of money and holding as much power over people as you can.</p>
<p>So if ones idea of success is having a strong business plan right out of highschool, getting into a top twenty university, working your tookus off and landing that job at the high powered firm of some sort with the sweet signing bonus and the slick ride, that is fine. But most people don't have any idea what they want to do out of high school and the point was that you don't need to, take some courses, if that means you are in college for a 5th year, but find the most perfect program for yourself, how are you any less successful than the guy who graduated in 3 years from Yale at the top of his class?</p>
<p>I'll say this again, these are only my opinions. These things have worked out greatly for me in my own life and i've seen the same sorts of things work out for lots of other people, but it is by no means the ONLY way to go about life.</p>
<p>Also, all analogies are imperfect, probably even this one. I am aware that there are pies which call for more than one type of apple. I am infact a large fan of pie, apple or otherwise.</p>