<p>But all you have is the ACT score. Add in the other factors as well. Test scores may well be the LEAST important factor. And yes, I’m well aware that international admissions are vastly different. All I’m saying is the published numbers for admissions are misleading for many well qualified students, who are lead to believe they have little chance when in fact they might have quite a decent chance. And for others, they are lead to believe they have a chance, when in fact they have virtually no chance. All chances are not created equal.</p>
<p>You’ve got to ask yourself, why is it a Midwest public school with few legacies and few URMs is getting a long term acceptance rate into Stanford of 31% and MIT of 36%? Those numbers are real and not some short term statistical fluke. (I’ll admit there might be some faculty kids preference at work here, but it’s not enough to throw the numbers that far off.) Is one school doing something right, or are the others doing something wrong?</p>
<p>Just for comparison purposes, here are some other acceptance rates for D’s HS for top ranked National Universities. Note that we don’t have a lot of HYPS alums around here, so we don’t get a lot of legacy admits.</p>
<p>Harvard 14%
Yale 22%
Princeton 26%
Columbia 23%
Chicago 43%
Duke 36%
Penn 25%
Cal Tech 37%
Dartmouth 29%
Johns Hopkins 49%
Northwestern 40%
Pomona 32%</p>
<p>I don’t have the national numbers in front of me, but I believe these are all at or above the national average. Some far above. So what’s going on? I think there are a couple of factors:</p>
<ol>
<li><p>It’s not just about test scores, these students are very well prepared. Curriculum, curriculum, curriculum! There are 22 APs on offer, plus more courses beyond APs, plus coursework at the local world class university for those who blow through what the high school can offer. When colleges say we don’t hold it against students for not taking APs that aren’t available, that’s probably a lie. Let’s be realistic, who is MIT going to prefer, a 35/36 with precalc or a 35/36 with Calc III or beyond.</p></li>
<li><p>These apps are prescreened. The college advisors know who stands a chance and who’s wasting their time. It’s never a sure thing, but they’re very good at knowing what each school requires beyond test scores and they discourage apps that have little chance. That increases yield.</p></li>
<li><p>The college advisors also have a workload, about 150 kids each (college advising only), that allows them to work with the kids on scrubbing their Common Apps. These things are not just thrown over the wall in hopes they come back with some miracle acceptance. They are as good as they can possibly be, if you take the time to work with the advisors on scrubbing them.</p></li>
</ol>
<p>Bottom line: If you are a top student who’s taken a truly rigorous course load, screen your app for schools you truly qualify for, and make your app the best it can possibly be, your odds are going to be better than the national average. Sometimes way better.</p>