<p>I'm not sure I agree with all of Eihjia's comments.</p>
<p>
[quote]
As far as I know, unless you do something ridiculously stupid (ya know, cuss every other sentence), the interview can't really ever hurt you.
[/quote]
Can the interview hurt you? Absolutely it can. Eihjia is right about one thing, given that there are 2700 interviewers, there is a quality control issue. Further, the interview is not required. Therefore, an interviewers comments are not as critical as some other parts of the application. That being said, there is a reason for the EC system. Any interview at the extremes, for good or ill, can certainly affect the application.</p>
<p>
[quote]
Visiting MIT is not considered at all in the admissions process.
[/quote]
Visiting MIT is definitely not considered at all in the admissions process. Don't stress about that.</p>
<p>
[quote]
It's reasonably irrelevant whether the interviewer liked you or not. The reports they write are supposed to be objective and factual, not opinionated.
[/quote]
The idea that the interview reports are objective and factual and not opinionated sounds good, but is ultimately wrong. For example, as an international interviewer, one thing that I am expected to check for is the students fluency with English. That sounds fairly objective, no? But in truth, particularly at the boundaries, its not so straightforward.</p>
<p>By definition, we are looking for the characteristics that make up a good match with MIT. We spend the interview looking for "objective" evidence of certain characteristics, and then we take an opinion about them. We express our opinion, backed up with as much objective evidence as we can, but it is fundamentally our opinion. </p>
<p>That being said, last year I interviewed a young man who I liked very, very much, but who I recognised was not a strong match for MIT. Similarly, I have met candidates who matched well but whom I did not particularly get along with. In that regard, it does not matter whether they like you.</p>
<p>
[quote]
If the interviewer was as polite as you say, then I don't think you can infer anything from her ending comment.
[/quote]
I agree. I am an international interviewer, and the acceptance rate for international applicants is 3.9 percent or roughly 1 in every 27 candidates. Given that I tend not to interview 27 candidates per year, that means that most years, none of my applicants will get in. Indeed, every year I meet brilliant, talented, wonderful candidates who will not get in. I probably would not say something like "Good luck wherever you end up", just to avoid the confusion and soul searching that you are going through now, but I do think thought just like that all the time at the interview.</p>
<p>
[quote]
Have fun. Chill. Don't waste two or three months of your life freaking out about MIT.
[/quote]
This is of course completely correct and wonderful, if hard to take, advice. Relax.</p>
<p>Good luck.</p>