<p>My cousin graduated from Western Mich. Didn't really stand out to me.</p>
<p>Oh, 'round here it's known as a huge party school and is the destination for most of the good looking, not-so-smart girls. It's refered to as 'Wastern'</p>
<p>For the northeast Bucknell has good-looking students</p>
<p>how about penn, brown, duke?</p>
<p>hmm my parents went to UH and the girls there are okay, but right down the street you'll see some more decent girls working at the shops. campus is not good at all.</p>
<p>Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.</p>
<p>Then again, USC = University of Sexy Chicks. :p</p>
<p>what kind of question is this?? all colleges have really hot ppl and not so hot ppl. colleges don't accept based on looks. this is an unanswerable, impossible question.</p>
<p>"what kind of question is this?? all colleges have really hot ppl and not so hot ppl. colleges don't accept based on looks. this is an unanswerable, impossible question."
No.
'Hot' girls may select colleges differently than 'ugly' girls, say preferring beach colleges to inland ones. Or they are academically inferior/superior, or concentrated in certain geographic locations or gravitate towards them. They may prefer party schools to intellectual ones, or vice versa. I don't know which of these is true, but it's quite stupid to say there is no variation in the frequency of hot chicks among colleges. And even if none of my cited factors were true, random chance of selecting a hot girl ensures a few colleges would have a disproportionate amount of hot girls (although this would change from year to year).</p>
<p>I concur with USC (Although I've only been there, UCLA and Cornell, USC wins even without comparing to other schools).</p>
<p>I don't know if you've ever visited san diego state, playboy ranked us number 3 in partying for a reason and i think our girl population has something to do with it, i've been to UCLA and USC...I must admit USC is also a very fine school (UCLA on the otherhand was a different story..may jsut be my tastes though), SDSU seems to have a greater abundancy of good looking girls.</p>
<p>Suddenly, I feel so lucky for going to Pepperdine this September :)</p>
<p>HyRuleGurardian is exactly right. You can see more knockouts in 20 minutes in Montreal than you can all day on most college campuses. But those pretty Montreal gals tend to be bright, slender, graceful, sophistocated, and they speak with French accents. And who wants all THAT?</p>
<p>to defend myself again....beauty is in the eye of the beholder. maybe some ppl are into the beach/preppy look and may think this is attractive. others like the sophisticated look. others like the trendy look. as i said before, this is an unanswerable question. i hate using the word ugly, so im going to say that a lot of "unpresentable" ppl go to party/beach/"inferior" colleges. and let me tell you there are a loooot of nerds at usc. they just don't get out as much. so my point is that sooo many different types of people are in college. you can't categorize by appearance. just because you visited the campus a couple of times and saw about ten hot guys walk past doesn't mean that's the hottest school. there could be about ten times more nerds that you don't see. so eat that ashermn.</p>
<p>UF does not have enough attractive girls on campus.</p>
<p>i don't think "nerds that you don't see" matter in judging the school, at least for me. after all, you don't see them.</p>
<p>So the more important question might be, "Which college has the most attractive people that nobody ever sees?"</p>
<p>^^^ nah............</p>
<p>I agree with ASU. U. Florida, USC, and Pepperdine as well.</p>
<p>To whomever mentioned Duke, Brown, and Penn--No.</p>
<p>if this topic was discussed earlier, i would've made my mind up sooner.</p>