Much better at ACT than SAT.. what am I doing wrong??

<p>Some people do better on the ACT than the SAT or vise versa. ← this is simply fact. </p>

<p>To compare them…</p>

<p>SAT reading to ACT reading…</p>

<p>SAT reading can tell you if you can read at a college level… </p>

<p>ACT reading tests competency in reading… </p>

<p>They are completely inverse of each other, but one is required more or less for the other. </p>

<p>SAT math is more creative math thinking again, one is impossible without the other. </p>

<p>while ACT math is much more straight forward… (testing of concepts/rules) there’s generally an odd ball question or two to prevent a large amount of 36’s. </p>

<p>English in the ACT is tested by using 9th grade reading passages…</p>

<p>Learning the rules so very well taught by the ACT english exam lets you go into CW on the SAT and apply those rules to college level writing. </p>

<p>ACT science… it’s meant to mess people up. The graphs are so horribly convoluted that discuss the most obscure concepts. </p>

<p>Oh wait… you never needed to read that graph… Many questions are simply logic questions quite simply as extending the line on a graph to make a prediction. </p>

<p>Fluency in english/being well read + knowledge that science part isn’t scary = high science score + intuitive scientific inquiry. </p>

<p>You might mess up the design of an experience in Bio 101 in college, but the ACT science experiments are perfectly done so what is being tested is common scientific sense.</p>