<p>I don’t want to shortchange either of the two posters with questions here, and I can’t recall whether I’ve addressed some of these specifics before, but I will now:</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>No one is going to listen to the full 10 minutes, unless you blow them away. And it will take a lot of talent, training and musicality to blow them away. They will pick specific segments and passages to listen to based on the piece. That’s the reason there is a commonality of requirements, among composers, periods, literature. Each work represents specific aspects that demonstrate talent, intonation, technique, musicality. Your instructor is the best person to advise you on where your strengths and weaknesses lie.
Think of them as an assessment tool, like the SATs, ACTS. It’s a benchmark of comparison. Using non standard literature may not help you. You change the parameters, and leave the assessment more subjective.</p>
<p>Take a peek through the audition requirements at colleges with music departments, audition based or otherwise. There are “standards” within the rep, by instrument and type of piece solo versus concerto, versus orchestral. Same holds true with pro orchestral auditions. These are the warhorses. They separate the wheat from the chaff. </p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Pick the pieces that represents best your level of accomplishment. Plain and simple. If the school has a chamber program, or a small ensemble bent, you may be best using literature from those genres, if it lies within your strengths or experiences.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Technical ability does not always equal musical talent.<br>
Proficiency on multiple instruments is not uncommon. Mastery of multiples is. Artistry on two or more is rare, and they are often within subclasses of the instrument group.</p>
<p>If you’ve won awards on two, I salute you. But you’re not alone. If you are conservatory level on two, then you are ahead of the curve. But you’re still not alone. Use your judgement, and that of your instructors. Don’t let Uncle Joe tell you otherwise, unless Joe sat in the NY Phil or teaches at Colburn. </p>
<p>If you consider yourself a conservatory level applicant, you’re a bit ahead of most that will submit. But by no means all. It can be a plus, but it’s instrument and institution specific.</p>
<p>It is part of you as a “package”. It is not necessarily an uncommon skill set, particularly among those that use this forum.</p>