<p>
</p>
<p>[Construct</a> Validity of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator ? Educational and Psychological Measurement](<a href=“http://epm.sagepub.com/content/46/3/745.abstract]Construct”>http://epm.sagepub.com/content/46/3/745.abstract)</p>
<p>If he had ** proven ** Myers-Briggs to be incorrect then nobody would deal with it.</p>
<p>The collegeboard also writes that the SAT test is not an IQ test but SAT and IQ tests have a massive correlation. Would you like the study for that too?</p>
<p>^ What the hell are you on about? Your attempt at trying to make a clever analogy failed.</p>
<p>liulaw, I see myself in you. INTPs unite!</p>
<p>Also,</p>
<p>[INTP</a> Central - Powered by vBulletin](<a href=“http://forums.intpcentral.com/]INTP”>http://forums.intpcentral.com/)</p>
<p>I am saying that MBTI will write whatever it can to help promote its development just as CB is doing. Saying that the SAT is an IQ test is not politically correct and so CB will not reveal the linkage between the two. But the fact is is that SAT has a high correlation to an IQ test (o.82) and thus a good indicator.</p>
<p>The abstract that I gave you was not written by “MBTI”. It was written by researchers, just like yours.</p>
<p>Yes but it’s also a coincidence how that same study is on the myer brigg’s website. The website will take in anything that gives even the tiniest bit of support but reject anything that tries to discount it’s efficiency.</p>
<p>^^^^ You like to flaunt your INTP-ness, don’t you?</p>
<p>It is not a coincidence. If somebody from the New York Times writes a raving review of a book, why wouldn’t the author of said book put the review on his website? Regardless, my point has been proven. There are two sides to the Myers-Briggs story. Furthermore, you have not proven anything. I accept the possibility that Myers-Briggs ** may ** be false. However, I reject the notion that the article you submitted successfully ** disproved ** Myers-Briggs.</p>
<p>okay i agree with you there. To think this argument rested on one word: proven…</p>
<p>In any case, this comes back to the point of your thread, a useless one at best. You wanted to see other people’s results, resting on a false assumption of the test!</p>
<p>^ It’s CC. Nothing better to do at 4 in the morning. I love a good debate haha</p>
<p>I’m an ENFP [the Inspirer]</p>
<p>54% Extroverted
91% iNtuitive
6 % Feeler
27% Perceiver </p>
<p>I’m an A/B student. Actually, i’m really lazy and have no doubt that i could get straight A’s if i tried more [here’s to turning over a new leaf for sophomore year!]</p>
<p>I don’t really care about the Validity; I thought the test was fun.
Anyways: Straight As
Introverted (I) 62.07% Extroverted (E) 37.93%
Intuitive (N) 55.88% Sensing (S) 44.12%
Thinking (T) 58.33% Feeling (F) 41.67%
Perceiving (P) 57.58% Judging (J) 42.42%</p>
<p>Your type is: INTP</p>
<p>INTP - “Architect”. Greatest precision in thought and language. Can readily discern contradictions and inconsistencies. The world exists primarily to be understood. 3.3% of total population</p>
<p>whatever…im taking my result with a grain of salt because of the said study…</p>
<p>anyhow, I did this out of mere curiosity: </p>
<p>ntroverted (I) 64.71% Extroverted (E) 35.29%
Intuitive (N) 54.29% Sensing (S) 45.71%
Thinking (T) 60.98% Feeling (F) 39.02%
Perceiving (P) 55% Judging (J) 45%</p>
<p>Your type is: INTP</p>
<p>INTP - “Architect”. Greatest precision in thought and language. Can readily discern contradictions and inconsistencies. The world exists primarily to be understood. 3.3% of total population.</p>