<p>I definitely acknowledge that a trained professional is going to look at many of these things very differently - curriculum, faculty, productions - than many of us, including prospective students. Having that perspective is very helpful. There are ways in which I know things professionally, including in the arts, where I might have strong opinions, might see things that others don’t see. But it doesn’t mean that if I see deficits that the work is worthless. I don’t think anyone here is saying that.</p>
<p>I happen to agree that seeing questionable performances, questionable productions, etc. shouldn’t make us judge a program negatively. Whether it’s because of risks or a bad day or just a whole bunch of real weaknesses, this is what life is. No one nails everything, wins everything, or is perfect. </p>
<p>In what I do, there are aspects where I could say, “this shows lack of training” or “this shows lack of understanding of fundamentals.” I would feel this way more about something like social work, for example, where there are professional ethics and standards that simply cannot be violated. In the arts, well, I just can’t say that there are such absolutes. I had significant training, and I can tell if someone else follows the same standards I might think are important, but I can’t say that they should or shouldn’t be doing things my way or any other way. And I’m extremely open to the idea that they might be working through a learning process, perhaps trying new ideas, perhaps not fully developed, perhaps doing things I’m not aware of. I think in creative fields - and I say this with full respect for serious training - there is still a fair amount of wiggle room in what is “sufficiently good” or not. And certainly within an art form that has a significant aspect of popular appeal, sometimes being “skilled” or “properly trained” has only so much value, anyway. </p>
<p>Ultimately, I think people have to follow their own instincts. If a certain education or training style appeals to you, you should trust that you will make the most of it, or that if you need to make a change, you will know to do that. </p>
<p>In the choice among colleges, with my D, for example, she ultimately had to decide what she wanted to do her FIRST year, because trying to know what she’d absolutely want in the long run became too difficult to project, because schools, locations, etc. are all so very different. No one could tell her, “This ONE kind of program, this ONE degree,” etc. was THE only way to achieve her goals. But not having been to these schools, obviously, already, she had to take a chance with whichever one she picked. She picked the place she wanted to be for the first year, aware she might choose to transfer. She chose based on curriculum, location, and all of the other factors she knew she cared about. She also considered what was her lowest financial risk, in case she decided things weren’t what she wanted. </p>
<p>Having a lot of choices can be a real burden! I think there are lots of tangible factors, but also a lot of this that is very personal, and that can only be decided by one’s gut feelings.</p>