<p>Please tell me the scores I need for a 4 or 5, maybe you can just post all of the scores like:</p>
<p>5: 54-100
4: 46-53</p>
<p>Please!</p>
<p>Please tell me the scores I need for a 4 or 5, maybe you can just post all of the scores like:</p>
<p>5: 54-100
4: 46-53</p>
<p>Please!</p>
<p>i don't think its that lenient.............</p>
<p>according to my book..68~90 is a 5</p>
<p>anyone know how it's scored? as in what random numbers you multiply by and such?</p>
<p>What about Macro? Same curve?</p>
<p>well...according to my PR book
MC: #correct-0.25<em>#wrong=MC score
Fr: 1.7</em>Q1+1.5*(Q2+Q3)</p>
<p>then the composite score is the sume of the two parts =approximately 90
and for Macro 65~90 is a 5
micro 68~90 is a 5!</p>
<p>AP Macro Official Scoring 2004</p>
<p>MC: #correct/60 - (1/4 x number wrong) = weighted score for Section I
FR: Q1 out of 13 x 1.1538
Q2 out of 8 x .9375
Q3 out of 6 x 1.25
71-90 is a 5
53-70 is a 4</p>
<p>According to my book, you can answer 45 MC right/15 wrong with 5s on the free response and get a 5. Or 40 right/20 wrong with 4s on the free response and get a 4. So it's not bad at all.</p>
<p>Yea, Chunlin's is about right. Our Econ teacher is a grader and that's what he told us.</p>
<p>Thats true for those point values, however the questions wont be worth 13, 8, and 6 points all of the time.</p>
<p>So for a more general scoring method,</p>
<p>the first question is worth 11-13 points and the multiplier for a max score will make it 15.</p>
<p>and the second and third are worth between 5-9 usually, and the multiplier for the max score will make both worth 7.5 points.</p>
<p>For a total of 30 points for the FRQ section.</p>