@traveler98 – I agree with what you say in post #216, except for the “chance of audit” comment – I don’t know how big or how small the actual chances are, but it’s not a good idea for a young person starting out in life to have a cavalier attitude based on small risk. I mean, what are the risks that I will get in a car accident every time I go out for a drive? I haven’t been in an accident in more than 20 years, and I’ve never been in any accident that totalled a car or caused serious injury --and I have been driving for almost 48 years. Lots and lots of accident-free miles. And yet I buckle up my seatbelt and make all my passengers buckle up every single time.
Risk analysis makes sense for actuaries dealing with large number, but “I probably won’t get caught” is not a good setting for that. It may very well be true… but plenty of people do get caught – and Charlotte says she wants to work in government and get a security clearance. So she may very well have to turn over her tax returns for scrutiny by an agency other than IRS – so she doesn’t want to make mistakes that will haunt her down the line.
Keep in mind that IRS priorities also change over time. I think that those “Request for Payment” letter are probably a very cost efficient way for IRS to collect a lot of money, including money that really isn’t owed – because I’ll bet a lot of people simply pay up for smaller amounts rather than try to figure things out and go through the trouble of documenting it and sending a letter off to the IRS. So it probably is beneficial for IRS to set their algorithms to be aggressive in sending out those letters.