<p>this one was easypeasylemonsqueezy.
it was most definitely WHEN. it should have been THAT.
say it now.</p>
<p>If you guys get this omitted, then I have license to ask the CB to remove all annoying math questions I didn’t like.</p>
<p>Has fostered for decades isn’t inherently wrong. You can say for example:</p>
<p>He has received good grades for years.</p>
<p>This would imply he is still getting good grades, analogously:</p>
<p>(Although) New Zealand has fostered music for decades</p>
<p>Please void the CAUSTIC/VEHEMENT one… that could have gone either way
oh, and the EXECUTION/HANDLING one… that could have gone either way.
Thanks, CollegeBoard. We love you. </p>
<p>…not gonna work.</p>
<p>It doesn’t even matter, this has/had debate. Obviously the ‘when’ is wrong. If SAT asks for which answer is “most right” then switching when to that is “most right,” not has to had.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I don’t remember always in the sentence also, so let’s discard that.
However, you can’t really view present perfect like that. When I say, “He has loved me for 30 years.” You view the sentence as “he loved her for 30 years, and still does.” not “He is still in the process of loving her for 30 years.” 30 years refers to the length of time in which he loved her, and present perfect allows the readers to infer that the loving still goes on.</p>
<p>This question made me upset, so I just replace New Zealand with the made up country of Britney Spears. Hahaha.</p>
<p>And read the sentence out loud.
Although New Zealand HAS always fostered music for decades, it was not until the 1980’s when New Zealand began to reach foreign audiences …</p>
<p>Don’t you feel as if there’s supposed to be something else?</p>
<p>I believe the correct sentence was “Though New Zealand had fostered music for decades, it was not until the 1980’s when New Zealand musicians began to reach foreign audiences.” </p>
<p>I think that no one is actually disputing that “when” is indeed wrong right? As for replacing had with has, something is wrong with the sentence… I think you can’t use “began” if you have “has” in the front. The word “began” indicates that the process of reaching foreign audiences is still ongoing, so essentially the second part is indicating a present tense event that is still happening after New Zealand fostering music. So if the first part is present perfect, there is no timezone to distinguish New Zealand fostering music and musicians reaching foreign audiences.</p>
<p>It was not until I was 5 that I began to reach higher.</p>
<p>It was not until I was 5 when I began to reach higher.</p>
<p>Shttt. I got this one wrong…</p>
<p>MOTHER ****er there goes my 2300.</p>
<p>Dammit ragggeeeeee 1@#%!@#$!#@%@$#$(%!*(#</p>
<p>1@#$%!5 spamk#*$</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>He has left me, so I began to look for another man.</p>
<p>I think I just did.</p>
<p>@jeff: that sounds pretty awk</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>How does it sound awkward?</p>
<p>Is anyone else extremely ****ed off right now? Made two really stupid mistakes that probably cost me the 2300.</p>
<p>Exacerbate (totally knew what it meant)
Having laid</p>
<p>see, look. this is clearly correct: “It was not until the formation of the National Park Service in 1916 that preservation and recreation came to be viewed as compatible goals.”
it is clearly THAT</p>
<p>It’s the began, it sounds much better when you say “He has left me, so I am beginning to look for another man.” Began indicates you already found another man since it’s past tense indicating you are no longer looking now, it doesn’t means that you just started looking like the meaning you intended.</p>
<p>What are you talking about? Exacerbate in the Writing section?..
You’re making me nervous…</p>
<p>Why must “when” be “that”? I seriously think No error is quite possible for new zealand</p>
<p>It was not until ______ when ______</p>
<p>He has left me… basically, he left you sometime in the RECENT PAST
i began to look… this is in the PRESENT</p>
<p>for me, writing is all instinctual, so it’s really hard for me to describe/explain why.
But i just know it’s awk</p>