<p>I've already taken 2 subject tests... considering 3 more, all of which I'm pretty confident in. </p>
<p>Do colleges actually look beyond the 3 sat subjects they require? or is it just pointless to take more than 3. </p>
<p>if it isn't going to help me that much I rather save the $50+ i have to spend taking 1 SAT II (int'l test center)...</p>
<p>Depending on what scores did you receive ?
If you received two 800 scores, I would take only one more Subject test and aim to get an 800 on that one as well.(Instead of taking 3 more and getting mediocre scores)So if this is your case; Pick a third subject test based on what you know the best ; example: If you are great with chemistry , and you didn’t write it already, write a third test in chemistry.
What are your other stats, write them so that we can help you make a better decision, without other stats it is much harder to tell what would be best in your situation.</p>
<p>760 US and 800 math ii. </p>
<p>science is something i’m gonna take so at least there’s sat ii bio and probably chem. </p>
<p>and last one i’m considering is lit</p>
<p>and lit… well i figured that i almost always -0 for CR passage reading in SAT (tho some have told me taht CR is nothing compared to sat ii lit) and am doing well in ap lang right now</p>
<p>Bio and chem. Pick one. Not both</p>
<p>Only take more than 3 if
<p>no need. it will make you look like a test obessed student</p>
<p>I believe Harvard is the only school that requires 3 subject tests, and every other top school requires 2 or none…id take one in science definitely, since if ur going to major in a science or engineering in college or ur applying to a school like CalTech or MIT then def take a science one, hope this helps</p>
<p>^No georgetown also requires 3. So does radcliffe colleges</p>
<p>and princeton</p>