<p>I have been accepted to Northeastern and WPI, and I doubt I will be accepted to Harvey Mudd, but if I were to, I think I would choose Northeastern over it as well. I am pretty set on this, but I thought it would be good to check to make sure I am not making a drastic mistake.</p>
<p>I have visited Northeastern and WPI, and I feel much more at home at Northeastern. I love big cities (NY, Philly, Seattle) and I love the feel of the Northeastern campus. The social scene also seems the best at Northeastern by a significant margin, though I am not the party type. While WPI is a train ride away, it felt much different and I keep getting told that you rarely leave campus when you are in college.</p>
<p>Of course though, academics and preparation in your field is the most important aspect. I want to make sure that my social/location preferences are not outweighing academic strength too much. I feel confident in being prepared at Northeastern with the co-op program, and I feel that there is not much of a significant gap in the programs of the three schools from my research. Is this off-base? I like the academic structure of WPI (4 quarters, 3 classes on average per quarter) as well as the project based learning style, but that is not enough to outweigh the rest.</p>
<p>Once graduated, I realize that the recognition of Northeastern (while it is a growing school) will probably have a decent gap to WPI and Harvey Mudd in the tech community. Can anyone shed any light on how much this gap will be and how this will affect job prospects?</p>
<p>Short Version: Northeastern for best location / experiential learning / academics / social combination, is it crazy?</p>