<p>For what it’s worth, I grew up in Evanston and was around the NW campus a lot, with friends whose parents were profs. After having lived away from Evanston for 30 years, I took at job at NW as a researcher for a few years. </p>
<p>I hate to say this, but my overall impression is that NW is a rather mediocre also-ran, the perpetual number 11 of the big ten. I was unimpressed with most of the profs I worked with, though a few were excellent. Overall, I would say it is somewhere in the middle in terms of academic quality. Indeed, I perceived it as a party/frat school that came at a phenomenal price. (I went to Harvard, and believe me, NW students simply do not compare in quality of mind or work habits. Indeed, NW continues to be over-shadowed by U of C, which is deeply resented.)</p>
<p>As an employee, I found NW rigidly bureaucratic, lazy, and arrogant. There were capricious rules, which often seemed to pop out of nowhere, often to the detriment of students (e.g. deadlines that, if missed, resulted in loss of stipends or even scholarship funds, which I witnessed while administrators remained casually indifferent). I have worked in many academic environments (Harvard, Insead, IMD, to name a few), and I found NW to be the worst in these respects. </p>
<p>Regarding the price tag, that would be a long discussion. The school clearly has money - they are always building state-of-the-art facilities that compare well with Club Med. </p>
<p>There are certainly first-rate profs and researchers there, I worked closely with one for whom I had nothing but respect. Evanston is a very nice town and community. But when I took my daughter to see McGill as a prospective student, it appeared to me to be everything that NW wasn’t. </p>