<p>Never mind, they didn’t know from the other topic either. It must’ve been from my experimental.</p>
<p>side note; For the fuel cells passage</p>
<p>was there an answer talking about how a part of the passage would justify the same thing for drilling in Alaska?</p>
<p>i’m sure… i know that it was in the passage. but i don’t think that was in the question. cuz that’s so specific. idk</p>
<p>does anyone rememember the snowflake question because i think ephemeral is wrong</p>
<p>oh, it was corroborate and ephemeral</p>
<p>sentence: scientists have a hard time _____ the information that people have seen dish sized snow flakes because of their _______ nature</p>
<p>Hey can someone clarify the auspicious/succumb question?</p>
<p>I think the question was: Louisiana has been available to avoid development, though other areas safety aren’t as ____<strong><em>, the South’s coastal grass lands </em></strong> development.</p>
<p>I thought it was circumvent for the second because Louisiana was in the South and it did not get developed.</p>
<p>I think it was a choice that I did’t pick- pretty sure I picked auspicious…succomb</p>
<p>Yea, would succumb fit though? The question confused me as to what it was asking. It seems that this may be the only one I got wrong. Except for in the last writing section, I’m scared that raped me. I didn’t have enough time to triple check.</p>
<p>I’m pretty sure “auspicious/succumb to” was correct. It was something like “Louisiana has been able to avoid development, but the future of other wetlands is not so __<strong><em>, as they </em></strong> development projects.”</p>
<p>Yes Louisiana is in the south, but so are Alabama, Florida (Everglades), etc.</p>
<p>Can anyone elaborate on the “prescient” question I dont remember it at all</p>
<p>Mark Tain wrote prescient novels, because his stories came true in the future…</p>
<p>lol, that was horrible but something along those lines…</p>
<p>That’s a good point DoleWhip. I probably got that wrong. It shouldn’t matter too much though. Right?</p>
<p>The prescient was something like: She wrote a book that was about predicting the side effects of whalehunting, which was surprisingly ______.</p>
<p>Missing one sentence completion shouldn’t matter too much (I already missed the one about art _____ science, because I thought all the choices looked bad).</p>
<p>Prescient is definitely right for the book question.</p>
<p>Can someone elaborate on…</p>
<p>elites/latitude (it was something about how they changed goverments, but even still the ___ did not participiate).</p>
<p>taciturn</p>
<p>The taciturn question was something about a guy that surprisingly gave a long-winded explanation for something, even though he was usually __________.</p>
<p>Kittiekc, the sentence was something like “Although the authoritarian government allowed ______ of the opponent party to participate in politics, lower members of the party did not have as much ______.”</p>
<p>@ 187 again</p>
<p>I put abrasive because I thought that taciturn implied shy. I guess that is wrong. Ekk.</p>
<p>@Dole</p>
<p>I put something…inclination</p>
<p>elites…latitude was right. because latitude can mean freedom from narrow restrictions, freedom of action, etc.</p>
<p>'m not sure about the auspicious succumb to one.
I beleive he question was somehin like
"although the [some bird species] has been dying off, the future of [them] does not look so _<strong><em>, as the costal wetlands </em></strong> development in the South.</p>
<p>I picked auspicious and succumb to also, but I realized auspicious has a positive connotation. So idk :/</p>
<p>^ Its auspicious/succumb to.</p>
<p>What were the other choices for the bird question?</p>