<p>Oh and #11 on the first writing section was either a shorter answer or the longer answer including “whether”. Anyone?</p>
<p>Chilean tree answer was they or something. The tree was singular</p>
<p>Oh and #11 on the first writing section was either a shorter answer or the longer answer including “whether”. Anyone?</p>
<p>Chilean tree answer was they or something. The tree was singular</p>
<p>andes one i had …people had to walk… b/c the other ones didnt make sense w/ the llamas carrying their belongings. it would’ve been ambiguous pronoun w/ “their” otherwise?</p>
<p>chilean trees was was instead of were b/c they only used one tree as the subject</p>
<p>@AAA are you sure it was “was”?
i remember the only verb error was with they</p>
<p>but for your writing section, was your passage about facial expressions?
trying to figure out my equating section</p>
<p>Shiggy, I had the facial expressions one and I didn’t have writing experimental so I think that one stands.</p>
<p>For the facial expressions writing paragraph, the first question that asked you to revise the 2nd sentence or something, was that no error?</p>
<p>yeah im pretty sure i remember a no error early in the passage</p>
<p>@Shiggy…maybe you’re right. it was something w/ plural vs singular whatever that answer choice was</p>
<p>I don’t think I put no error… but I’m not sure…</p>
<p>@AAAx: You’re right. It was “and the people had to walk” or something like that. One of the other choices was “requiring walking” which was wrong because that implies that the place requires you to specifically only walk.</p>
<p>I put… requiring walking or something. Wrong I guess. I failed Writing again I think.</p>
<p>Writing’s too hard to talk about because I don’t remember the details. I’m confident though… Lol.</p>
<p>I feel worst about writing atm. Cuz they always have little tricks that I don’t notice.</p>
<p>I think #14 was D. “and so people had to walk”. To me, it was a bit awkward, but the best answer.</p>
<p>It was definitely D. The entire sentence never mentioned the subject (people)</p>
<p>^Excellent!</p>
<p>how many “no errors” did you guys have for the middle section?</p>
<p>I got 2, it was 21(or 20, forgot which one i put) and 29.</p>
<p>@scott: I don’t know, I didn’t count. I am assuming four or so.</p>
<p>I think every other practice test I’ve taken cites Churchill in the last Error ID question. How strange is that?</p>
<p>the paco one i had much more no errors than just two maybe 8-9 overall</p>
<p>@187: That’s odd. The Churchill one had a misuse of the word “respectively”.</p>