<p>I really hope this is true, because a 43 = 70 is by far one of the easiest writing curves out there.that would suggest that the writing section is extremely harsh</p>
<p>Shahdin, so the math is curve is -1 780 according to your friend?</p>
<p>no math is</p>
<p>800
770
740
720 dont know beyond that had a 720 with raw 51.</p>
<p>Are you 100% sure? Because look at the November 2005 Scores thread on College Confidential:</p>
<p><a href=“http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/sat-preparation/116794-official-november-sat-i-scores.html[/url]”>http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/sat-preparation/116794-official-november-sat-i-scores.html</a></p>
<p>Some people reported scores of 790 on the math.</p>
<p>i can mail the pdf score report to anyone tomm, maybe 05 also two versions of the test</p>
<p>here’s my email: <a href="mailto:ali.m.haq@gmail.com">ali.m.haq@gmail.com</a></p>
<p>i emailed it to anyone who asked, not doing anymore now since im too lazy to keep sending emails.</p>
<p>Cool. Thanks man. Hopefully the curves stay the same.</p>
<p>Shaheir’s curve thing definitely looks plausibly for this months SAT, although I don’t know if they factor in students performances of this month. I hope it stays the same, cuz that reading curve was fairly generous.</p>
<p>they dont curves r predetermined</p>
<p>That reading curve is actually pretty average if you take all the prior years into account.</p>
<p>If in fact this November test (or one of the November tests) was the same as November 2005, then the new curve will remain the same as the old one. Not because the curves are pre-determined (they aren’t), but because an identical test does not need to be equated again.</p>
<p>Well, CR had one different section so that might throw off the curve.</p>
<p>OMG…5 days until scores come out…
How much do you guys think I could get if I missed like 6 on CR?</p>