<p>MD Mom, my own daughter (my own DAUGHTER!!!) told me when she was student teaching that she can’t help but favor projects containing glitter. We certainly had words about that, but I’m not sure it helped.</p>
<p>I sincerely and respectfully believe that there is a feminization of our school system that isn’t helpful to boys, and particularly boys without male figures in their lives. Feel free to flame me, but I think it’s true.</p>
<p>I know. Poor things. As Mr. Brooks says, “Boys used to have an advantage in math and science, but that gap is nearly gone.” Horrors.</p>
<p>Our school has recess (and kids say the pledge every morning, another thing “people” say is gone from schools). Not all public school districts match the generalizations.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Same here. Though in 6th grade we had “open classroom” in some classrooms, and less desk time, more moving around and independent work. Funny, I clearly remember there were 5 girls in that class and around 30 boys, because I came into that class after Christmas and having one more girl was a big deal. Parents of boys favored that setup, I guess.</p>
<p>I was an education major and student teacher in East Harlem for a time. I wrote a major research paper on how boys are favored in class - called on more often, helped with incorrect answers rather than told “wrong” and to the next kid, etc. As a parent helper in my kids’ classrooms 20 years later I didn’t see a lot of change.</p>
<p>Elementary schools have always had primarily female teachers, perhaps because that education level/age group is seen as needing primarily advanced mothering. I’d say now, if anything, there are more male teachers at that level than there used to be. But I don’t think there are very many men will go to school for that long to make that little.</p>
<p>My son had a pretty tough year this year before getting his stuff together the second semester of 8th grade. One of his teachers gave him an academic award for excellence in a subject at graduation. She pulled us aside the last day of school and told my husband and me that our son is incredibly bright but it totally an “auditory learner” and when he is left to listen and process information, he will always be one of the top kids. However, when he is required to write notes in an exact format while the class is going on, he will be lost every time because the process of copying takes all of his attention and he misses the instruction.</p>
<p>His high school is much more open to kids taking their own notes and being responsible for how they choose to take in information.</p>
<p>Agree with you on the obsessiveness of color coding, glitter, and artsy projects.</p>
<p>However, my Catholic elementary school did have notebook checks and penalized students for two things:</p>
<ol>
<li><p>Incomplete notes or worse, no notes/doodling showing one wasn’t paying attention in class. </p></li>
<li><p>Poor penmanship. Most of us got hit the hardest here…especially considering how seriously it was emphasized back then.</p></li>
</ol>
<p>Back to the reference about male CEO’s, I do not really see this pattern of male underperformance among male students from financially or intellectually elite backgrounds. It is more a failure of non-elite males, many of whom are often treated, in the words of Brooks, as though they were an “unfeeling, uncommunicative, testosterone-driven cretin.” There appears to be little enthusiasm for improving the performance of non-elite male students among many of the women in the education community, as there has been over the past few decades with regard to female students, both elite and non-elite. I worry that the Boomers’ war between the sexes has been carried forward, maybe not intentionally or even consciously, through the attitudes and policies supported by many of the female Boomers in the education community.</p>
<p>Glitter. My bete noir. Now that all of the scientific journals have electronic manuscript submission, I have to mail in the glitter separately to the editor, and hope that an editorial assistant will glue it neatly onto my manuscript!</p>
<p>It’s not a question of less or more. It’s a question of different.</p>
<p>There is no question that boys learn and develop differently. Who are you to say which is better?</p>
<p>I mean as long as we can make sure that those Evil*****People are miserable from as early as possibly as much as possible, what more could we possibly want?</p>
<p>But those bilogical differences have always been there and this is being treated as a new crisis. Why we should be discussing failure of our boys doesn’t ring entirely true. As the mother of a son, I see the differences, but it was no excuse not to compete for high scores and the expectation that he do his best, even if it was a stupid assignment. </p>
<p>From observing classrooms in multiple states as a sub, parent volunteer, etc. I still see boys controlling the classrooms. Males may be going to school in smaller percentages, but the median wage is significantly higher for hs educated young adult males than for females($32,900 to $25,000 in 2009), so college is still not considered necessary for financial independence. I see it more as young girls catching up rather than young men falling behind. SAT scores don’t show a gap for males, nor do emplyment figures.</p>
I have both daughters and a son. I expect my son to do his very best, but his very best involves listening carefully and taking the notes that engage his memory, not having a notebook where the Re line and the Do Now are lined up perfectly and the bullet points made with the exact words that the teacher uses.</p>
<p>He did a truly excellent science project for which he received a very high grade and learned a lot. The projects chosen for the science fair were almost all done by girls and almost all had glitter, sparkle and color coordination. The projects displayed within the classroom showed that almost all of the very academic and highest graded projects were done by boys and were ugly. Where does this set of priorities come from?</p>
<p>
Every child goes to school. Many do not take the SATs or become employed. Of that population, males are over-represented.</p>
<p>I don’t have a problem with requiring someone to do their best but I don’t see the point in frustrating students to the point where they give up.</p>
<br>
<br>
<p>I’ve watched the top-ten students in our local school district for many years and it’s dominated by women.</p>
<p>Perhaps this is a reason to homeschool - you can tailor the learning style to what works for the individual.</p>
<br>
<br>
<p>I’d have to see the numbers and the breakdown by the kind of work. Male-dominated trades can pay quite well for those without a college degree - though there have been many of these kinds of jobs lost in the great recession.</p>
<br>
<br>
<p>BLS June 2012 shows that there is a 4 point spread between men and women over 20 years old in unemployment. The same spread exists between men and women over 16 years.</p>
<p>I think that a very great deal depends on the controlling model of the local school system, for students in public schools. Parents who can pick a private school have more options. </p>
<p>On the whole, I liked our local system. However, a number David Brooks’ comments certainly ring true for it. The school system was anti-competitive, to the point of strenuously discouraging competition (except in middle-school or high-school athletics). Recess was still included, but the time was more limited than when I was a student. Cooperative learning was highlighted, including group tests, where a single paper examination was passed around among 4 students, each of whom had equal time to contribute to the answers on it. It seemed to me that the school day was less regimented than in my time, but there was a high premium placed on the kind of pleasant sociability that (<em>stereotype warning</em>) seems to me to come somewhat more naturally to girls, speaking very generally.</p>
<p>The earlier comment about the socioeconomic divide, with boys near the top generally doing well, but boys in the lower socioeconomic groups having a real struggle with school rings true to me.</p>
<p>Later on, I think it turns out that the traits that are emphasized for success in elementary school are not so advantageous for high-flying careers.</p>
<p>BCEagle91, I tried contacting the Microsoft Office team about the glitter toolbar. I sent them a diorama on the history of glitter, as they requested, but I guess it just wasn’t neat enough.</p>
<p>Although the recession has hit hs educated males first, they still earn almost $10,000 more than females that only have hs degrees. Living in a blue collar town, I understand that one reason a young male may not be motivated in the classroom. Depending on who he knows, he may still end up at the mill earning $75,000+ at age 19. </p>
<p>I do think there are problems in education, but the numbers don’t point to easy answers. And I do think parenting, video games, lack of physical outlets, lack of male teachers and a sense fo entitlement among white American males are all fair game for argument.</p>
<p>I had a look around for glitter effects - it looks like Adobe Photoshop has the best that I’ve seen. GIMP may have them too - but it appears that your typical word processor doesn’t have that support.</p>
<br>
<br>
<p>It might be interesting to do an analysis of male/female top ten students by district median income for a state.</p>
<p>We cannot necessarily compare the group of men who are currently “in power” as CEOs, politicians and the like with boys and young men who have been through some school systems in the past 10 or so years. The curriculum and educational philosophy has changed markedly in many districs. When my D12 was in kindergarted our ditrict piloted a math curricumum called TERC (no idea what that stands for). It is heavily based on drawing and complete sentence descriptions of how you got your answer and why it worked - or didn’t. You could have the wrong answer and describe your “strategy” well and get the points. D hated it, but as MiamiDAP said someplace back there, she just got it done and moved on. Many boys just flailed and failed because they refused to comply with the stupidity of explaining how they knew that 1+1=2 or draw anatomically correct turtles to demonstrate that fact. The “brighter” the kid the more trouble they had with writing about things that they just knew. Then there’s the fine motor skills and penmanship issue. It took forever for DS15 to do his little worksheets and that doesn’t include the time spent sulking under the dining room table.</p>
<p>Writing was the same - no open ended write about your weekend stuff. And, as Bay alluded to, if you do you’d better not write aboutt playing StarWars with your neighbors. They had this 4 square method of some kind with prompts like “write about and autumn leaf” while fitting your ideas into the blocks. Mr. verbal got writer’s block every time which morphed into a behavior block. D12 really doesn’t like to write, but she could follow the rules, giterdone and move on.</p>
<p>I never felt like it was teacher bias, but a curriculum issue. There was no room for the old school math wiz who understood quickly, and got the answer right.</p>
<p>Saint fan, my D could do math in her head, but she got it wrong on the WASL because she couldn’t explain it.</p>
<p>Curriculum in some places seems skewed to gain test results, no comment on whether the tests used are the best way to evaluate achievement.</p>
<p>The glitter comments mystify me however, I have two girls and I don’t think they ever used glitter on a project for school.
They did make Christmas cards using glitter when they were in preschool.
:)</p>
<p>It’s been my experience that the glitter and color coordination always came into play with regard to term projects that would be displayed for parent nights or for open houses. Always for an audience, and so the look of the projects always counted for more than the content.</p>