I am not so sure Hunt. If she had posted things supportive of Palestinians or had disputed the that Isis was jihadist, but did NOT go on to say it was set up by the CIA and Mossad, she might not have been fired. The issue is one of academic honesty and integrity, not of her personal views. I am not sure academic freedom extends to statements with literally no basis in fact. I would not want a professor on my faculty (if I had one) that posted ideas that are clearly not true, regardless of politics. Also, her academic interests (according to WaPo) include social justice writing and black political protest rhetoric. Seems these lies may well have leaked into the classroom. Oberlin seemed to really consider this carefully, but we have no knowledge of the specific evidence they used to make this decision.