You keep saying the OCR study was incomplete, but honestly, what you’re pointing to doesn’t make sense, because it wouldn’t make any difference. The OCR did the review that the kind of statistics you are imagining would have led to, specifically a review to see if any differences were because of discriminatory policy or clear bias. They didn’t find any. Again, even if there were statistical evidence of a disparity, without OTHER evidence of bias, there’s no case. And there was no other evidence, so there’s no case. It’s that simple.