<p>
That’s a very bad analogy, but I agree that it wouldn’t be wise to send this to the CB.</p>
<p>hey guys can someone confirm that the anecdote in the critic passage was for the purpose of introducing something, i thought it was clear but i would like your opinions, thanks</p>
<p>honestly i think the entire antidote vs stimulant was just a matter of best choice vs. second best…</p>
<p>Both make a lot of sense…but i felt that antidote wrapped up the entire passage…if it had said something like:</p>
<p>Looking at the quote “…blood rushing…”, what is the log path acting as for him?</p>
<p>I would’ve chose stimulant. I believe it asked what it was for him based on the entire passage… Antidote describes how the path was like a medicine for him; it made him feel happier when he was angry.
Also, i thought a stimulant couldn’t really stimlate happiness from anger. Yeah I hope collegeboard sees how they gave us so many questions with two possible answers and bases the curve on that.</p>
<p>Wasn’t there a question that asked “What happened to Kael’s work over time?” Is this the question with objectivity vs disagreement?</p>
<p>@user i put objectivity and @member not antidote i put antidote, im talkign about the literary style ANECDOTE in the critic passage</p>
<p>@antonioary tha answer is liek interfering w the political system</p>
<p>if you are right i missed 4 :'(</p>
<p>yes, i missed 4 as well im hoping for a 750, usually minus 2 is 800 minus 3 is 780-790, so around 750-770 im guessing</p>
<p>I don’t think antidote makes sense in the context of the other question that says that his happiness is only temporary or etc. A stimulant is like caffeine - it makes him feel more energized and cures his anger for a short amount of time while an antidote is a permanent fix.</p>
<p>i put inevitable for the rewilding passage but no that i think about it, it might have been a bit extreme :S</p>
<p>I don’t think inevitable works in a world where the author is advocating a different way of going about engaging the environment. If it is inevitable, the author’s points and alternatives become a moot point.</p>
<p>Why would it be the journalists’ objections? It would be more likely they want to be apart of the financial market or whatever that question was about. The government dabbling in state control over the news would hurt a free news cycle.</p>
<p>It is defiantly inevitable because the author was saying if you dont follow my plan this sequence of events is inevitable.</p>
<p>I put undesirable at first, but then I reread the section of the passage that the question was referring to. It mentioned a default scenario, which I perceived to be a scenario without action. In the case of inaction, effects on the environment would be inevitable.</p>
<p>“It is defiantly inevitable because the author was saying if you dont follow my plan this sequence of events is inevitable.”</p>
<p>Yeah, that just indicates that the sequence if, they don’t follow the author’s plans, would be undesirable. Having an alternative plan proves that the current scenario can be changed and, thus, not inevitable.</p>
<p>Was illusion an answer for the log road question?</p>
<p>“Right so most journalists would object, and democracy’s being hurt is a lot further down the road.”</p>
<p>The article was talking about the government’s possible control over the news cycle and nothing in it, from what I recall, talked about the journalists’ role or opinion in such a change.</p>
<p>Lol if you don’t put undesirable then you are basically saying that the author does desire all of those negative things to happen. Which he doesn’t.</p>
<p>For the log road I remeber putting an illusion which by definition is illusion is a distortion of the senses, revealing how the brain normally organizes and interprets sensory stimulation. While illusions distort reality, they are generally shared by most people. and wasnt the log road distorting reality for him and helping him escape, even though he really wasnt thats why i put illusion.</p>
<p>“For the log road I remeber putting an illusion…”</p>
<p>The question asked what the trip was to the author. Even if in reality it was an illusion, the author clearly didn’t think of it as one.</p>