<p>Does anyone have the exact Trojan article? I am doubting myself if only because i think i may have failed to distinguish the author’s tone from that of the other philosopher and his work. I really did not get a sense of doubt from the author at all though.</p>
<p>@ jlewis what about the number of problems we omit? it doesn’t count toward our raw score? then why was this other person telling me that raw score =67-omit-(wrong x 1.25)?</p>
<p>Here’s the link to the trojan passage:
[In</a> search of the Trojan War - Google Books](<a href=“In Search of the Trojan War - Michael Wood - Google Books”>In Search of the Trojan War - Michael Wood - Google Books)</p>
<p>what was the answer to the last one about the mother/daughter
the last sentence implies that rose?
rose understood her daughters something
or the daughter decided not to do the story</p>
<p>@Overrated </p>
<p>That’s the formula you can use to calculate the raw score. Omits don’t count towards your raw score, meaning if you omit a problem your raw score does NOT increase by 1. You cannot omit every problem and get a 67 raw score. The only thing omitting does is prevent you from losing an ADDITIONAL .25 (so 1.25 lost total for a wrong answer).</p>
<p>I don’t know it’s still a tough question. The author barely has an opinion he just seems like a plain narrator with no real opinion.</p>
<p>@lukereed there was only 1 question for the mother/daughter passage</p>
<p>okay i get it…</p>
<p>so should we omit problems or guess if we don’t know?</p>
<p>wait did anyone get a cr about how humans perceive differently than dogs cus dogs use their sense of smell and humans use their eyes to believe or something along those lines. was that experimental?</p>
<p>^experimental.</p>
<p>@overrated</p>
<p>Guess if you can eliminate two or three answers</p>
<p>“the whole discussion about the nature of writing” </p>
<p>Was this the question where the critic was like “My writing is thinking” and the choice was E?</p>
<p>what were the other choices in the erroneous and circumspect answer for the vocab?</p>
<p>I specifically remember a question about whether Rose either understood something about her daughter or that the story she requested probably never happened.</p>
<p>I have a question </p>
<p>Funding of radio short passage
-harming the function of america’s democracy or something.</p>
<p>Is this answer certain??
I thought the answer was something about journalists.
Did anyone else put that as an answer??</p>
<p>Also, </p>
<p>movie critic
-for question with 2 people, she wasn’t the only one that preferred less ornate writing</p>
<p>wasn’t there an answer choice about how she was inspired by them?</p>
<p>did anyone put that one as an answer??</p>
<p>Lastly,</p>
<p>Rewilding
-Most important concern about rewilding raised in P2 - that the proxy species could irreversibly impact the native species and their ecological system?</p>
<p>does anyone remember other answer choices for this one?
was there one about how the proxy species would not adapt to the new place? </p>
<p>Thank you!</p>
<p>"Funding of radio short passage
-harming the function of america’s democracy or something.</p>
<p>Is this answer certain??
I thought the answer was something about journalists.
Did anyone else put that as an answer??"</p>
<p>Some people think it’s the journalists answer but I think the majority think it’s about harming democracy/political system</p>
<p>"-for question with 2 people, she wasn’t the only one that preferred less ornate writing</p>
<p>wasn’t there an answer choice about how she was inspired by them?</p>
<p>did anyone put that one as an answer??"</p>
<p>Yeah I put that.</p>
<p>"Most important concern about rewilding raised in P2 - that the proxy species could irreversibly impact the native species and their ecological system?</p>
<p>does anyone remember other answer choices for this one?
was there one about how the proxy species would not adapt to the new place?"</p>
<p>Yes there was an answer choice about not adapting but the majority think that it would irreversibly impact the native ecosystem</p>
<p>this just might be the most controversial/heavily discussed CR ever…</p>
<p>**yup i just looked through all thread posted in “sat preparation” and this thread has 400 more than the next one…lol</p>
<p>Does anyone know the other choices for the answer WELL FOUNDED</p>
<p>^i think there was also alarmist and indifferent…</p>
<p>@Clauxy universal was a choice</p>