<p>I cant agree on you this one and well probably never know the answer unless the SAT broadcasts all their answers, which they won’t by the way or unless you’re a person that got a perfect score that knows all the anwers.</p>
<p>I also cannot agree on you this one because the same kinds of people that replied before are answering emphatic. We should take a a 100 person vote on this. balanced/emphatic. And ill start listing down the votes. </p>
<p>My vote is balanced.</p>
<p>+1 emphatic</p>
<p>Yea, so the flaw with a vote like this is that the supporters of the preestablished answer will be less likely to come and post their opinion because there is no need to and it would just be excessive to repeat something on which a consensus has already been reached. However, the supporters of the other answer will be more than eager to show they’re right. </p>
<p>Anyway, +1 emphatic.</p>
<p>for the passage wit the jump roper,
it says one of the answers is “comparison” was “foreshadowing” one of the choices? if so doesnt that make more sense?</p>
<p>for the movie critic passage,
what were the other choices for the question that asked “the purpose of the personal anecdote in lines__ was to” and what was the right answer</p>
<p>for the rewilding passage,
explain why these are the right answers and what other choices were present in those questions
Passage 2 author would think the conservationists mentioned in Passage would
think that the “significant risks” mentioned in Passage 1 were well-founded
-coping with problems and not finding solutions
-Passage 1 would think the last part of Passage 2 (the suggestions about what to
do with the money) was inadequate.
-Last part of passage 2 - suggesting alternatives.
-both authors took positions on a possible plan of action</p>
<p>i know this is alot but please do your best and anything you remember is helpful</p>
<p>OK, to make your argument more persuasive. You should also try to exactly state the question. “Compared to passage 1, passage 2 is more…”</p>
<p>Emphatic-2 Balanced-1</p>
<p>Honestly, I understand where you are coming from, and if I were you, i would be extremely positive about my answer. But the problem is that you’ve got the correct answer to a different question. The question as worded on the SAT asked for passage one. We’ve already gone through this a couple thousand times in this 150 page thread.</p>
<p>Count me for emphatic.</p>
<p>Why don’t we just put it this way: (I think someone already did earlier in this thread)
Passage 1 was emphatic compared to passage 2
Passage 2 was balanced compared to passage 1</p>
<p>Passage 1 was emphatic compared to passage 3
Passage 2 was balanced compared to passage 1 </p>
<p>counting in owlehn’s vote</p>
<p>I still dont think there were enough people to confirm that there were enough for emphatic. Some might have also agreed on emphatic even though they answered balanced on the test.
By the way, what was the answer to the situation about the Oscar Wilde question. Was it very technical, but not that expressive. ( I dont recall what the performer was doing)</p>
<p>^
^
Lol, he was citing passage numbers, not vote counts. XD</p>
<p>haha good call =)</p>
<p>
cool cool cool</p>
<p>… no. he didnt even vote</p>
<p>emphatic-3 balanced-1</p>
<p>+1 balanced</p>
<p>What was the answer choice that had “journalists” in it?</p>
<p>emphatic-3 balanced-2
good job, boston.
reminder: vote on what you answered. don’t change your mind after hearing the arguments.</p>