<p>What were the other choices for resolute?</p>
<p>jwilliams, is that the one with the extinction dual passage?</p>
<p>no emotion doesnt make any sense. she said she liked to confuse the other girl. ice skater flustering is the smae one i thought</p>
<p>jolly thats sentence completion. *** it wasn’t the skaters one?! Eh I think I’ll just wait until Oct 29 or whenever the hell they come out -_-</p>
<p>^^I also got ice skater flustering.</p>
<p>It was objectively, we talked about that in the back posts.</p>
<p>And once again, we’ll figure out if its p1 or p2 when we get or scores back?</p>
<p>but im 99.999999% sure its p1 because once again…p2 was at the end of the question. Meaning, logically it was talking about p1.</p>
<p>it’s not balanced. it’s emphatic</p>
<p>what was the balanced emphatic question? was this to one of the short passages?</p>
<p>What bork said.</p>
<p>how was it objectively?</p>
<p>he referred to disagreement over her work in the passage, and basically wrote a concise f u about her opinion concerning style + substance to all her dissenters in the final paragraph</p>
<p>yesssss so glad the basset hound one was experimental cuz i don’t remember that AT ALL lol…it’s funny how half of us may have read a question wrong, guess that’s what happens in the heat of testing</p>
<p>Dang ■■■ how could I have read it wrong?! Maybe It said Passage 2 is different from Passage 1 in a sense that PASSAGE 2 was more_____ </p>
<p>^___^ plspls.</p>
<p>I think it was the short passages where you have to compare the two. One took a position and one was balanced (was that an answer choice?). Passage two didn’t take a position and was more balanced. I think it was about govt funding of PBS. correct me if I am wrong.</p>
<p>Um, it wasn’t really disagreement. It was just different opinions. And if there were opinions, it meant it wasn’t objective.</p>
<p>ughhhh nooooo…i think i accidentally omitted two questions…does anyone remember the number of questions per critical reading section?</p>
<p>different opinions is the same thing as a disagreement</p>
<p>where was anything about people not looking at her work objectively, or fairly in the passage?</p>
<p>it was 24, 23, 20</p>
<p>I remember one of the parts had 23 questions… weird.</p>
<p>funding of PBS by govt: position and balanced, right?</p>
<p>Does anyone remember what the passages were ABOUT for the p1/p2?</p>
<p>yeah and even my experimental had 23 o_o</p>