<p>was there a sc question about a mayor showing the rich town to downplay the terrible economy of the rest of the town or something or was that experimental,</p>
<p>I second coup. AND. On all my practice tests (30?) I’ve gotten mainly 760s.</p>
<p>^yea on the june sats, it looked like i only had 5x on the mc (consolidated list), but it turned out i had like 8x.</p>
<p>And p2 IS balanced. BUT the question was asking for p1. p1 is emphatic.</p>
<p>user2134
yes, i remember that mc. don’t know what I put, however.</p>
<p>what was the emphatic question if it was only about p1?</p>
<p>I usually get 780-800 so this would be pretty bad for me. </p>
<p>There are three for balanced and 3 for emphatic so it’s pretty… balanced haha</p>
<p>@Ivysaur:
- P2’s last paragraph (if we DID have the funds for this, we should spend it on) = alternatives to rewilding?
- P1 would view ^ that last paragraph of P2 as … wasteful or inadequate? (I said inadequate).
- P1 thought the future without rewilding was … undesirable? (Others put inevitable, but I personally thought it WAS avoidable because we have the option of rewilding).
- Something about the cheetah in P1 and mammoth in P2 - both are extinct.
- The situation with the camel in rewilding - unable to live in the nonnative environment.
- Most important concern about rewilding raised in P2 - that the proxy species could irreversibly impact the native species and their ecological system?</p>
<p>And that’s as much as I can remember. ):</p>
<p>And @Comet, on the May SAT, I got an 800 on CR, tyvm.</p>
<p>Linger I put downplay…? What was the other word?</p>
<p>I put emphatic!</p>
<p>it was asking for 2 not one absolutely positive, sorry emphatic people</p>
<p>@ coup. It may have been undesirable but, i think it was inevitable based on vocabulary usage and what would happen if we didn’t do what the author said to do. (can’t remember what its called XD)</p>
<p>@coup i agree your answers.</p>
<p>THe question was asking about passage 1!</p>
<p>what was the emphatic question!?</p>
<p>^sorry seminolefan. It was asking for one. There’s no in hell it was asking for 2. I read that question like 3 times. Impossible.</p>
<p>can someone PLEASE make a list of everything</p>
<p>hey guys whats like 7 and 2 blank for this reading, im hoping for at least a 670</p>
<p>I read 10 times lolz. IT was defff 1.</p>
<p>it makes it sound like the question was worded like this: “with respect to passage 2 but not neglecting the nature of passage 1, which is equally as important as passage 2, what is the tone of the author in passage 1 compared to passage 2”</p>
<p>Here you go, yeolgongkim :)</p>
<p>Sentence Completions
-Decorum…
-prolific…trenchant
-retiring…penchant
-slovenly
-ecletic…unremitting
-mudslinging
-permeate
-decorum
-traversing…wealth
-reconciliating…enmity
-benign
-illicit</p>
<p>Passage About Jumping Rope
-Parents habits were predictable
-confidence
-vibrant and well being for the helix
-ice skater</p>
<p>Passage about Trojan War
-homer’s works were the most reliable
-magna carta question…to vividly portray the time gap between the writings?
-uniform most nearly means unanimous
-probably did occur because there was no evidence against it
-some celebrate events are not verified</p>
<p>Movie Critic
-first few lines sugesst that the narrator has admiration for Kael
-Whom would it offend? - Discerning Moviegoers
-Oscar wilde - artfully written biography with factual errors
-lively and compelling for the question about the ‘fizz’
-hacked down means critize vigorously
-passage suggest there was disagreement over her work
-for question with 2 people, she wasn’t the only one that preferred less ornate writing
-something about colloquial</p>
<p>Short Passages
-harming the function of america’s democracy or something.
-interfere with government’s democray
-passage 1 was more emphatic
-passage 2 makes points, and passage 2 presents conflicting views</p>
<p>that the proxy species could irreversibly impact the native species and their ecological system?</p>
<p>i put that it affect existing ecological communities
but i was confused with the “menacing …” one</p>