<p>oblivion.</p>
<p>that writing question was definitely emphasis not emphasize</p>
<p>yea there was a writing question where you had to correct it to emphasis.</p>
<p>kbbm that’s what i got too.</p>
<p>wasnt there sth like “well-founded” about what paragraph 2 author would think about the concerns of conservationist in paragraph 1??</p>
<p>
[Direct</a> Hits](<a href=“http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0981818455/]Direct”>http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0981818455/) is an SAT Vocabulary book</p>
<p>for the rewilding passage, what was the answer for the cheetah and elephant one?</p>
<p>@ Harambree (page 47), definately wasnt experimental. I had grid-in math experimental. Rewilding was real, but I don’t remember any water bottles or band passages.</p>
<p>ok so who put alone over short-lived?</p>
<p>10char10char</p>
<p>jae: yeah that’s what i got. passage two author agreed with the conservationist.</p>
<p>@Jae: I put “well-founded” as well, since the concerns of the conservationists were about the consequences of rewilding.</p>
<p>How many questions could one miss and still get a 750?</p>
<p>
Okay, so the rewilding passage was not experimental?</p>
<p>Precocious isn’t the answer. I don’t recall any sentences about being premature.</p>
<p>dude, it’s short-lived.</p>
<p>@jae0191
that’s what I put; the “…” referred to in one passage were “well-founded” according to the other.</p>
<p>damn it. i’m getting so many wrong and there are so many controversial ones.</p>
<p>truffle: for the fizz, I remember I picked the first answer A. but I don’t remember what it was about. I think it was like…energy…or something.</p>
<p>probably 4 to still get 750</p>
<p>@illusion I don’t remember what A was.</p>
<p>Did anyone get that that the “fizz” was strictly American in its formality or somethin</p>
<p>illusiondestiny:
it was lively and something</p>