<p>again does anyone else know the other choices for the downplay magnitude sentence completion?</p>
<p>
You are correct. International students take a different test</p>
<p>
I would also like to know.</p>
<p>@via sorry i don’t remember. but i’m 100% sure that it’s downplay/magnitude.</p>
<p>blah, i’m mad because i can’t remember </p>
<p>naslghosviunhao9yrtrynhuIOUFOEGFIEGN8EGFUHENOUehogn8gfhihmlnifhuoiudgnhdiognigeiyenoiunshfiusghfohusfSIGHSDMIOFHSDIFGUSNHDFUISHDMGTHSTOISJTJFYJNJTGFDBHBDGFH
dklfghoibsvfnoishgiodfhfdhugidhfiuhidufhsdipfhgsdofiuhjsdfiubhjgf</p>
<p>venting done</p>
<p>
Me too. That seemed like a fairly obvious answer to me</p>
<p>I know the general consensus is “discerning moviegoers”</p>
<p>but the passage says here</p>
<p>[Sontag</a> & Kael: opposites attract me - Google Books](<a href=“Sontag and Kael: Opposites Attract Me - Craig Seligman - Google Books”>Sontag and Kael: Opposites Attract Me - Craig Seligman - Google Books)</p>
<p>it says only those of us who, despite the fact that we may respond, loathe being manipulated…</p>
<p>To me, it seemed like a very narrow set of people. That’s why I put “Virtually no one”</p>
<p>I kinda see how “discerning moviegoers” works, however, because it talks about them being aware. </p>
<p>/sigh</p>
<p>For the jump rope passage, wasn’t there an answer that was along the lines of “significant personal pastime”</p>
<p>for the trojan war about the no evidence against it
there was a line in the passage saying how “modern findings have yet to refute” or something like that
it was in the last paragraph and was the key phrase to answering the last question… besides all the other answers weren’t mentioned or were too extreme</p>
<p>@Harambee Yes there was.</p>
<p>consolidated list?</p>
<p>Here you go, via 
Sentence Completions
-Decorum…
-prolific…trenchant
-retiring…penchant
-slovenly
-ecletic
-unremitting
-mudslinging
-permeate
-decorum
-traversing…wealth
-reconciliating…enmity
-benign
-illicit
-thriving
-misnomer
-circumspect…erroneously
-downplay…magnitude
-wasted</p>
<p>Passage About Jumping Rope
-Parents habits were predictable
-line __ suggests that they were confident about their jump roping skills
-vibrant and well being for the helix
-ice skater
-a significant personal pastime</p>
<p>Passage about Trojan War
-thucidides based most of his work from Homer
-magna carta question…to vividly portray the time gap between the writings?
-uniform most nearly means unanimous
-probably did occur because there was no evidence against it
-some celebrate events are not verified
-paradox because people firmly believe in something without evidence
-Thucydides conveyed that the imbalance of power worked to the benefit of some, at the expense of others.</p>
<p>Movie Critic
-sentence __ shows that she had detractors
-genius most nearly means exceptional talent
-true most nearly means genuine
-first few lines suggest that the narrator has admiration for Kael
-Whom would it offend? - Discerning Moviegoers
-Oscar wilde - artfully written biography with factual errors
-lively and compelling for the question about the ‘fizz’
-hacked down means critize vigorously
-passage suggest there was disagreement over her work
-for question with 2 people, she wasn’t the only one that preferred less ornate writing
-something about colloquial
- the personal anecdote reflects the nature of writing
-resolute</p>
<p>Rewilding
-ethical issue because humans probably had a part in it
-Passage 2 author would think that the “significant risks” mentioned in Passage 1 were well-founded
inevitable OR undesirable
-coping with problems and not finding solutions
- Passage 1 would think the last part of Passage 2 (the suggestions about what to do with the money) was inadequate.
- Passage 2 would think the conservationists mentioned in Passage 1 (who had concerns about impacts of rewilding) - well-founded.
- Last part of passage 2 - suggesting alternatives.
- concession leading to rebuttal
- Something about the cheetah in P1 and mammoth in P2 - both are extinct.
- The situation with the camel in rewilding - unable to live in the nonnative environment.
- Most important concern about rewilding raised in P2 - that the proxy species could irreversibly impact the native species and their ecological system?
-the authors use questions to raise doubts regarding their opposition</p>
<p>Funding of radio short passage
-harming the function of america’s democracy or something.
-analogy
-passage 1 was more emphatic
-passage 2 makes points, and passage 2 presents conflicting views</p>
<p>Log Cabin Short Passage
-antidote
-shortlived </p>
<p>Mother/Daughter Short Passage
-conviction/conceding</p>
<p>Confirmed^^^</p>
<p>-decorum
-eclectic
-thriving
-circumspect/erroneously
-conviction/conceding - Mother/Daughter? Completely forget this one.</p>
<p>Can anyone remind me of these questions? I have no clue…</p>
<p>hey guys i just had a question about kael passage, one on the closest meaning to “real” or something similar to that…
i thought it was necessary, because at the end of the sentence it says “things that you would not recognize even if the movie is without them…” or something? the wording is probably wrong, but it was along that line. so i thought it was “necessary”
can someone explain why it is “genuine” instead?</p>
<p>Mother one was definitely conviction because it was refering specifically to lines 2-3, which talked about “best education”.</p>
<p>so antoi, harambee, alihaq, based on your extrapolations from this chart (<a href=“http://www.erikthered.com/tutor/SAT-Released-Test-Curves.pdf[/url]”>http://www.erikthered.com/tutor/SAT-Released-Test-Curves.pdf</a>) and your previous SATs, what do you think that a -4 and a -5 result in?</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>agreed.</p>
<p>why is conviction/conceding?</p>
<p>It was def conviction. Was there only one question for this passage?</p>
<p>What was the question for the vocab “wasted”? And can I get an explanation for “Discerning movie goers”? I thought it would be “virtually no one” since it was pretty much a rhetorical question</p>
<p>
It seems like the answer has either to do the with the personal anecdote in line __ either revealing insight into her character OR it reflects the nature of writing OR it introduces something. </p>
<p>I’m not really sure</p>