<p>@Brostradamus there was stimulant as a choice? o.o oh well, doesn’t matter. It’s still antidote because the road was a “cure” for his anger. It’s not stimulant because stimulants cause liveliness and happiness. The character was not “high” or w/e, he became calm.</p>
<p>everlastingx, he stated that humans took part in making them extinct or something when humans hunted them or something. It wasn’t the future generations choice because he never mentioned future generations.</p>
<p>@everlasting
The intro paragraph basically was a paraphrase of “ethical issue because we had a part in it”
It said how we disrupted the evolution etc therefore it is our responsibility
(Mmeory is cluttered)</p>
<p>The passage didn’t say anything related to the innate relationship between humans and animals nor did it argue about our essential relationship to future generations (it just wasn’t mentioned, typical sat trick question)</p>
<p>@all: what is the answer for: the fizz something (about Kael)
is it lively …
or is it loud … abrasive</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Yes, I got that. Can another person confirm?</p>
<p>@lovelybones, I think those were two questions.</p>
<p>Can anyone else confirm that “the relationship b/t style and substance” was an answer.</p>
<p>everlastingx, I remember also picking “ethical issue because humans probably had a part in it” because I remember it said something like that in the beginning part of the passage.</p>
<p>For personal anecdote, are you sure it reflects the nature of writing? I thought it was an introduction to something. Because after the anecdote, the author had like an “ah ha” moment and proceeded to describe something.</p>
<p>Yeah the anecdote did reflect the nature of writing, I forget why but I was very confident in my answer for that one.</p>
<p>@all: what is the answer for: the fizz something (about Kael)
is it lively …
or is it loud … abrasive</p>
<p>@esthetique HI AMY!</p>
<p>frankeinsteinz, I put “lively.” Part of my reasoning was that the author was talking admiringly about the critic, and putting “loud and abrasive” would just be out of place because of their negative contexts.</p>
<p>I got the same answer for the personal anecdote as esthetique. Or are we confused and those were both the same answer? All I know is the choice I picked had the word Introduction in it</p>
<p>frakeinsteinz, i put lively, but i’m not sure.</p>
<p>@esthetique
yes it was because his primary thing wasnt about the friendly relationship… even though it was evident it existed
he wanted to talk about the “realization” of soemthing profound as a result of that personal encounter, aka the nature of writing and how you can get really cool ideas when writing ideas out on paper</p>
<p>cool it’s my answer too</p>
<p>what would the score be for -2? do you think the curve is gonna be harsh?</p>
<p>I don’t remember that “personal anecdote” question. Could someone please refresh my mind about that one?</p>
<p>I also got personal anecdote leads in to an introduction… or something like that.</p>
<p>
I’m very certain that the answer was humans probably had a part in it. Here’s an excerpt from [the</a> source of this passage](<a href=“http://www.scribd.com/doc/7175574/Donlan-Etal-AmNat168-2006-22]the”>http://www.scribd.com/doc/7175574/Donlan-Etal-AmNat168-2006-22):
[Donlan</a> Etal AmNat168 2006 22](<a href=“http://www.scribd.com/doc/7175574/Donlan-Etal-AmNat168-2006-22]Donlan”>http://www.scribd.com/doc/7175574/Donlan-Etal-AmNat168-2006-22)</p>