<p>Was it like a real problem where you have to use 2pq and p+q=1 to find the frequencies? Or was it identifying characteristics of a Hardy Weinberg community (no net mutation, random mating, no migration/emigration)</p>
<p>If it is the former, then I have to study that:/</p>
<p>Ha, the Barron’s tests were so annoying, ha. </p>
<p>Their questions were really random. </p>
<p>And Parallelism, ya, the Sparknotes tests are pretty horrible. I’ve heard that they’re not very accurate at all. One of their questions were still mentioning Monera! </p>
<p>I am extremely nervous. I hope the actual test is much easier than the sparknotes and barrons practice ones. Otherwise, I’m going to cancel my score.</p>
<p>Is anyone else kind of excited for the test? I think my adrenal medulla, situated above the kidneys, is releasing lots of adrenaline right now in response to the test. </p>
<p>SOOO EXCITED!</p>
<p>Good luck everyone! MEET BACK HERE TOMORROW AFTER THE TEST SO WE CAN DISCUSS!</p>
<p>Well GL to the CCers’ who didn’t took the test yet. I will be taking it in prox 1 hour. Hope for the best, atleast 750+, but borderline atleast 700+, since this will be my second time taking it and I only got 700 the first time.</p>
<p>I just got home (international).
This is my second time (first time jan 2011 - 680 :x) and I felt like it was easier. There were still some ridiculous questions + a damn stupid question that I HAD LAST TIME and got wrong and never found the answer of… Buut i’ll just hope for the best. 750+ pleaseee</p>
<p>This test is looooooooooooooool. It was so much easier than June 2011. If you did bad then you were unprepared. It really doesn’t get as easy as this. It tested on main stream stuff. I mean the first 15 questions were lol.</p>