<p>Unlike those of. Contrary to those needed of to fit into the sentence.</p>
<p>@SheepGetKilled - I don’t think so. He would actually be happy about it, because the paragraph was talking about a recent shift from human ----> nature (just what Thoreau would have wanted.)</p>
<p>Gains and losses was definitely the answer. The passage said that nature writing’s focus on the earth rather than the person could be good or long and boring, but it’s not all long and boring.</p>
<p>Anyone else, 4 no errors?</p>
<p>Also can someone find the Thoreau passage?</p>
<p>hopeful2013, I put gains and losses too. None of the other choices made sense.</p>
<p>It was gains and losses. The article stated that it was a good thing but had some bad things</p>
<p>@Syndekit
I don’t think so… For Thoreau I got something like “there were both positives and negatives” and…something else. </p>
<p>I know it wasn’t long and boring. Even though they used those words, the author wasn’t referring to Thoreau</p>
<p>what is 10E, -1MC?</p>
<p>what were the options for othe thoreau one? i remember putting human-centered and gains and losses</p>
<p>wait i got long and boring cuz it was exhaustive for the recent books.</p>
<p>did anybody get fickleness? for one of them?</p>
<p>for the biography one what did weighing mean? was it something like considering or something? can’t remember the choices</p>
<p>I got fickleness - about the kid whose ideas about what he wanted to do kept swaying, so none of his friends like him? Something like that?</p>
<p>what is -1/10E for the writing?</p>
<p>Considering carefully.</p>
<p>no i got fundametally Human centered ya thats what i got</p>
<p>i got fickleness</p>
<p>yep, fickleness was the right answer for whatever SC it was in. and I know for a fact that long and boring was not the right answer.</p>
<p>purplegael, I got fickleness for one and then mercurial for one in the same section.</p>
<p>And I put that weighting was considering deeply or something.</p>