<p>Sons- I put they both were attentive to what they thought the other felt.</p>
<p>The who- I put f(x)-3</p>
<p>the math vertex question was f(x)-3. The 15#15 question was one only or one and two, but the third one was false.</p>
<p>The_Who... III didnt work.
I. 6#15 = 15#6
II. 6#6 = 36
III. (6#15)^2 = (6#15)#(15#6)</p>
<p>III comes out to be (3*5)^2 = 225 = (5)(5) which isn't true.</p>
<p>C R A P. how about that one with the weird quadrilateral and it asked for the area i think i got 60;</p>
<p>I think the 3 options for the # question were
6#15=15#6(true i think)
6#6=36(false i think)
(6#15)^2=(6#15)#(6#15)(false i think)</p>
<p>C R A P. how about that one with the weird quadrilateral and it asked for the area i think i got 60; foodisgood why is the III wrong because (3#5)^2 X (3#5)^2=225 is true.</p>
<p>C R A P. how about that one with the weird quadrilateral and it asked for the area i think i got 60; foodisgood why is the III wrong because (3#5)^2 X (3#5)=225 is true.</p>
<p>no, the answer was that the father and daughter were both protective/sensitive of each other's feelings.</p>
<p>for the parabola question, the answer was a) f(x)-3. because the graph of y = f(x) had y intercept of 2.</p>
<p>I can't remember the a#b question exactly, but I'm pretty sure the answer was II only. I was not true. I'll explain why if someone can remember the details.</p>
<p>valikor, on that sentence completion with correct answer diffident/aloof, one of the wrong answers was RETICENT/pensive.</p>
<p>60 was correct on the quadrilateral question</p>
<p>so if i missed 2 or 3 in all what would that be?</p>
<p>so if i missed 2 or 3 in all what would that be? sorry for posting 2 of the same posts. i clicked too many times.</p>
<p>so if i missed 2 or 3 in all what would that be? sorry for posting 2 of the same posts. i clicked too many times.</p>
<p>FOOD IS GOOD:</p>
<p>The author of passage 2 did acknowledge that chemicals could help, but I don't think he advocated it as a long-term solution at all, since the passage talked about how screwed up everything will become if we use them over the long term.</p>
<p>Anyone else remember this one? The crop passage? How the author of passage 2 would respond to the particular sentence in passage 1 which talks about how chemicals are sweet?</p>
<p>2400SAT:</p>
<p>YA, "reticent"... you're right, my bad. The answer WAS diffident/aloof though, right?</p>
<p>Everything 2400SAT said is true, although i'm not positive about the a#b one, except that whichever one i chose was "<something> ONLY". I think it was just like 15#5 = 5#15 and that is the only true statement? yes?</something></p>
<p>Nalcon was correct on this one as well, i think.</p>
<p>I'm still wondering about that Physics passage..hmm</p>
<p>So was the surface area of cubes one 22?</p>
<p>Ill clarify on the math question with the # function</p>
<p>The answer was "I only"</p>
<p>for a#b it is (geatest prime factor of a) times (greatest prime factor of b) thus only I is right</p>
<p>For quadrilateral, I got 80, not 60. 60 was the area of the triangle I thought, not the area of the entire quadrilateral. because two side lengths were 10 and 12...you cant get area of entire quad with two side lengths unless they are certain ones.</p>
<p>"The author of passage 2 did acknowledge that chemicals could help, but I don't think he advocated it as a long-term solution at all, since the passage talked about how screwed up everything will become if we use them over the long term."</p>
<p>That questino was bs. The author specifically said that efficient chemcials but now i see ur point.</p>
<p>VERBAL
NAACP - women was advisor</p>
<p>1337- I think the drawing looked like this:</p>
<p>so i think it is 60</p>
<p>NALCON:</p>
<p>that was the picture, yes... and i'm pretty sure my answer was 60</p>
<p>1337haxor: yeah that's right i think, the a#b one... (that problem ****ed me off though)</p>
<p>OH, what was the question with the A, 2A+1, 2(2A+1)+1, etc? I think I got it right but i thought it was confusing.</p>
<p>I think i got 44</p>
<p>edit, nevermind, I think i confused this with another question</p>