Okay, remember not to discuss any specific FRQ until 48 hours and NEVER discuss any of the MC. Just post what you thought about it and how hard each section felt to you. </p>
I personally thought MC was easier than the practice tests I had to do during class and the FRQ’s have been the easiest since all the previous years.</p>
Can we discuss on our projected score? MC was okay, easier than the 2006 diagnostic I took, had trouble with FRQ 1, confident on most of FRQ 2, and aced FRQ 3</p>
This was my first AP test. MC was difficult because I’m a slow test taker, so I had to push myself to finish, which I did. The subject matter was very unbalanced, and what about all the urban models?
I didn’t pace myself very well on the FRQ, loads of information on the first and I missed a few points on the second and third one because I didn’t finish.</p>
Yeah, the FRQs never really prompted for examples, unlike some of the old ones. There were almost no questions on urban models (sector, concentric zone, multiple nuclei, latin american). this test was super easy. i overprepared when i read barrons 2 nights before. I could probably get a 3 or 4 by walking in on test day</p>
I used the Princeton Review but I only made it half way through. I felt some of the questions were really specific in MC, and 45 seconds a question is still really difficult for me.</p>
Okay, now i’m kind of nervous since CC people think the MC was easy. I personally, thought some of it was iffy. The FRQ’s were really easy though. I’m a pretty fast test taker so i finished the MC in about 20-25 minutes and went over it twice more after that.</p>
Hey what was up with that section after the MC? Like between the MC and FRQs. Was that normal? I took 2 other tests and I never did a section like that before.</p>
multiple choice was more difficult than i was expecting, the 2006 exam was much easier. had to make lots of educated and some not-so-educated guesses! many questions were very specific, i thought there would be more straight vocab. i was terrified that the frqs would have terms or countries that i would have no idea about, i was so happy when i saw them. hoping that they made up for my multiple choice.</p>
really hoping i managed a 5, i self-studied with a small group of friends (aka we all crammed last night…) so who knows.</p>
Everyone is talking about how easy the FRQ’s were, and I thought the concepts themselves were easy (as in none of them were about something I simply <em>didn’t know about</em>) but that really doesn’t mean I was able to give a concise answer- obviously I could do the Part A on the 1st one, but the Part B was hard for me, because they only have a certain list of answers that they accept, and just because something is logical to me doesn’t mean it is going to be an accepted answer. Likewise, I think I completely flopped on the 2nd one, because what was I supposed to even say? Yes, I can think of things that make sense, but that doesn’t mean that’s the answer they are looking for. The 3rd one was just easy for Part A, still iffy on Part B but hopefully I got those right…
So if I only got the Part A of 1 and 3, plus a few straggling points on the other sections (and maybe I’m just being too hard on myself, I could have done better than I think), is it possible to get a 5 (with about 60 correct on the MC, maybe 65)? I’m not familiar with the grading system.</p>
About the survey questions, 3 minutes seemed like not enough time. I was able to finish at only a few seconds left, and I had read all of the questions before hand… I know some of my friends didn’t finish. (in fact, everyone I talked to didn’t finish, but that wasn’t many people)</p>