<p>@cloverleaf96 I just stay away from personal pronouns unless I’m using myself has an example</p>
<p>I used “I” throughout my whole argumentative.</p>
<p>I think I put the challenging people to do something. was this the passage with a call to action at the end? I totally forgot, my brain is fried. lol</p>
<p>@thedude147, my teacher would give me a failing grade if I ever did that…</p>
<p>@thingschange, I don’t remember that question? Can you elaborate? Lol</p>
<p>What was the third question asking? I argued that the constant urge for more and more can ruin your character and lead to downfall. Did I address the question? </p>
<p>Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using CC</p>
<p>Looks like parallelism to me though. But then again, I don’t remember that question. Ahhh. Can someone elaborate ???</p>
<p>Man set out to select four poultry and then man set out to select four land animals (goats, cows, etc). Key words in the answer choices include omnipotent, un imaginative creativity, parallel structure,etc, sorry but does that ring a bell?? Haha</p>
<p>Hello everyone are we allowed to discuss the exam or do we have to wait 48 hours?</p>
<p>Or it can be anaphora? If that was one of the choices lol</p>
<p>Okay back to my prev question, could any experienced or confident writers out there tell me if I was being off topic by writing about the ownership of self choice and personal freedoms and then tied in with one’s sense of self. Basically my thesis was that by having personal freedoms people are able to discover their true passions and voice</p>
<p>@yukihime that’s pretty off topic to me… Seems like you’re writing about freedom & rights, which isn’t what the prompt asking.</p>
<p>thats not anything near wrong, yuki. i had nearly the same thesis, that owning an ideology or doctrine helps you find yourself. i used firsthand experience about freedom to worship and judaism to say how the religion helped people find themselves and their identity. you’re fine :)</p>
<p>did you write ‘owning’ personal freedoms or ‘having’? cause that could be the main difference though. how did you use the word ‘owning’ in the essay?</p>
<p>Yeah the prompt referred to tangible objects and intangible things like skills</p>
<p>But the reason why I said that was because the prompt said to analyze various types of ownerships, so I did idk</p>
<p>Yeah in my essay I did write that people were gaining ‘ownership’ of personal liberties tnx for the reaffirmation! :-)</p>
<p>I actually thought the English Lang. was decent… That either went well or not anywhere near well…
The multiple choice was done with five minutes to go and I left the center half an hour early cuz I didn’t wanna see what I wrote for the essays. My hands were killing after them lol</p>
<p>Oh does anyone know if like general knowledge can be used? My teacher said stay away from it but with the monuments I couldn’t help but use the example of the Muslim Kabah as an example of a perfect monument since it has historical significance, proper location, and pure intentions even though the sources were no where near close to that</p>
<p>Theoretically, I believe we are supposed to think about the different viewpoints and then make a position, although discussing all the viewpoints shouldn’t hurt I think…</p>
<p>One question: If I had no counterargument, would I be marked off significantly for it? I was hoping for at least a 7 on the essay, but I don’t know how badly not including a counterargument will effect my score…</p>
<p>^ introducing a counter argument is just ONE specific way an author can strengthen his argument. </p>
<p>There’s no requirement for a counter argument.</p>