<p>The game one was pretty simple if you know the conditions for a binomial model. The answer was 2 players who played 50 games every day and didn’t improve their skills throughout the course.</p>
<p>Did you guys get If you play the carnival games 2 times you’ll lose I think around $1.66? Or something.</p>
<p>I said it was the one where 2 players played once a day for 50 days.</p>
<p>ephemeralbliss and apkid, the answer was the one that said they DID NOT IMPROVE because binomial distribution has a SET PROBABILITY</p>
<p>i said it was significant the letter from japan took longer because the t test yielded significant results but the interval mdidnt, but an interval is two sided but or real test was one sided?</p>
<p>Yes! So happy with that binomial one…</p>
<p>@jackpot it could not be determind because the sample size was not big enough</p>
<p>i thought that was to simple of an answer lol</p>
<p>@jackpot hahah me too!! but it had to be cuz i believe the sample was like 9 and 12 that that is wayyyy tooo small
btw thank you everyone for posting on this forum, it is really helping me (even though the test is over) it makes me feel more secure to know what i did right and wrong, so THANKS EVERYONE 
and I hope everyone did well!</p>
<p>“The game one was pretty simple if you know the conditions for a binomial model. The answer was 2 players who played 50 games every day and didn’t improve their skills throughout the course.” -Niceboat</p>
<p>yep that was the only one where the PLAYERS’ SKILLS AND/OR PLAYERS WERE CONSTANT/the same</p>
<p>if players are different, different prob chance since some have better skills</p>
<p>@Lanie49 what do you mean “plot the point” for the investigative task? Do you mean putting the average in the table?</p>
<p>@luked, on the last part i there was part that told you to plot the point (the one you filled in) and i forgot to0 TT_TT</p>
<p>The investigative one for the table through me off, I went to that one right away since I didn’t feel like explaining in A and B right away. I created a linear regression and found the value, went back to the first two graphs realized I was an idiot since we know what the last value was xD</p>
<p>@Lanie49 - was that part c of #6 FRQ? like 25.5 ? something like dat</p>
<p>waitt I thought the one about Japan was not statistically significant…meh 
Yah I skipped the plotting point one too</p>
<p>for box and whisker was it that one of them had at least 50% of its values larger than the first</p>
<p>what was the one with the cow milk production?</p>
<p>i remember i put a which was something about chance? i had no clue tho</p>
<p>I didn’t plot the last point either. Wow. Lot of people missed it.</p>
<p>@megan702 - YEP</p>
<p>and for the point i got 25.25 not 25.5?</p>