<p>llewis: yes, it did say odd.</p>
<p>Marimare: For the passage, I sort of just assumed that the narrator was a third-person objective narrator…I didn’t think there were any tricks or anything that might indicate that whatever said wasn’t directly the truth.</p>
<p>llewis: Yeah, it had to be odd.</p>
<p>Keane Fan–I only remember mysterious and impressive, symbol of future successs, and the children were trying to fool the adults. </p>
<p>Yep, it’s 23 or…others</p>
<p>EDIT: </p>
<p>strandlib- I might be reading too much into this. Maybe I’ll forward College Board with an email. I think if my answer is correct, maybe the question was too tricky for the SATs.</p>
<p>i don’t think you misread the question…</p>
<p>After thinking about it, I agree with strandlib. As far as POV goes, I think it was third-person omniscient. I’m not sure though. THe reason I say is because I remember the character’s name being mentioned in the passage. And unless we were dealing with a lunatic protagonist, that qualifies it as third person.</p>
<p>Does anybody know how to contact CollegeBoard to challenge questions?</p>
<p>I thought the short puerto rican literature passage was messed up as well. I forget what i put but i remember not being confident</p>
<p>Sometimes, author use 3rd person reflective thought.</p>
<p>I’ll write something as an example.</p>
<p>The day was sunny. Mr. K walked out outside the door naked. </p>
<p>He was an honest man, who didn’t usually walk outside naked. He was the best of the best, an imaculate professional. </p>
<p>As he was walking around the neighborhood, a little girl looked at him.</p>
<p>She must have thought him weird.</p>
<p>Once again, I’m not really sure myself ^^;</p>
<p>Hmmmm, I’m really not too sure. However, I do have a little more confidence in my answer choice than yours.</p>
<p>As far as the Porto Rican one, that pretty much screwed me over. I practically guessed that she was rejecting a tradition.</p>
<p>Tradition = writers are “straddled” between American/Porto Rican or what ever.
Writer = wants there to be a synthesizing of the two cultures.</p>
<p>I don’t know. My logic is messed up, I know.</p>
<p>The Puerto Rican one was hard! I think that’s the one that only had one question after it, and while going through the answers, I crossed every single one off…so yeah, I honestly don’t even remember what I chose for that one, but I definitely wasn’t confident in my choice.</p>
<p>I said rejecting a tradition too, though I took the tradition to be labelling Puerto Rican authors as either American or Spanish, since the first sentence did state that they can’t be labeled as either, implying that they are now.</p>
<p>good night and good luck</p>
<p>Yeah, I just got the impression that the author disagreed with how the authors were being categorized.</p>
<p>Hasta la vista babyz</p>
<p>anyone think that the curve on CR will be higher than usual?</p>
<p>I don’t think so. It was -2 = 800 in october, and I thought this test was significantly easier than the one in October.</p>
<p>crapz0rz</p>
<p>any chance of - 6 being higher than 750??</p>
<p>lmao</p>
<p>lol, no -_-</p>
<p>dude i’m so glad took my last SAT test in october. sorry guys!</p>
<p>There are a few CR questions I’m not sure if we’ve reached agreement on yet:
- Yelling kid = show extent of fooling? or other answers…
- Puerto Rico = I put reject widespread practice as inappropriate, primarily because of his usage of the “eclipse” in the final sentence. It seemed that he advocated moderation of separation + unity, and clearly the critics were separating, thus eclipsing the actual fusion of both cultures.
- Irony of governess = Governess is supposed to teach, not learn</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>basically no. i had -7 for a 720.</p>