***Official December 9 ACT Science Thread****

<p>Wait..... i put the one that says n increased alot, and time increased alittle because it only needed to increase by 10^1 or something. Any one agree?</p>

<p>was the answer to the one that was (5x10^m)(8x10^n)?</p>

<p>wrong thread</p>

<p>Wait how is it 420? The question just asked for the change, and the change would be 280 (since that was the amount of temperature they said contributed with the greenhouse stuff). It didn't ask for the new temperature, I dont believe...</p>

<p>Science was easier, but I gotta agree that outside knowledge was kinda crucial. I mean we just started AP bio fly lab and if I hadn't done that I might not have finished it on time.
Anyways.. not bad</p>

<p>Yes, the difference was 420, and yes, I remember getting 3:1 for something.</p>

<p>Bt SHIZZLE. I completely screwed up the science part. I ran out of time and didn't even get to all of the passages. I did the shell one, the one with temperature changes, the one with pressure/speed of air, and one more I think... but thats it.</p>

<p>EDIT: Oh, and the head/skin temperature one. That one was a bit weird but doable.</p>

<p>420 was the difference one. you needed subtraction, the answer wasnt just there in one of the charts</p>

<p>Genetics was Easy.
Fission was OK.
The skin thing was hard becuase I was running out of time.
The engine - didn't know what was going on.
The earth, venus, and mars was pretty easy because you just had to use the charts and graph.</p>

<p>Science - 63D</p>

<p>Consolidated List of Answers</p>

<p>-the n andt (dec or inc) = I guessed increase both
-3:1
-constant then increase
- 420
- white allele for 2,3,4 only
- X^R X^r and X^r Y
- for a shell question comparing the current time with past time- increase for one thing and decrease for the other
-Venus and Mars</p>

<p>That's what I can think of at the moment. Did you get any other answers.</p>

<p>The engine graph one? I had no clue which one it was. I think it was the last on the that part of the science. Anyone have an answer?</p>

<p>Wait, wasn't there a choice that said "n increased alot, t increased alittle" and then another one that said "both n and t increased in great amounts"? whICH ONE WAS RITE?</p>

<p>i think they both had to increase a lot</p>

<p>Increasing T a lot would waste energy I think. The question previous was 1 second, so I would figure that you would increase the other variable a lot and T a little.</p>

<p>You would need to increase both by ALOT because you wanted to make it go from the thirteenth power to the fourteenth. Thats making the final answer increase by a FACTOR of 10.</p>

<p>what was the factor of t??</p>

<p>The goal of both was to increase density of blah blah right? And which one increased density the most? I think I put laser.</p>

<p>ok, i put both T and N increase by a lot because i do not remember any option that said that one would increase by a lot and the other by a little. I looked over them several times. Had I seen one, I would have gone with it. Because if it was an option, then both would be correct. So I believe that T and N increase is correct. </p>

<p>Also, I don't know why people are complaining about this test. The science was way easier then usual. The math was difficult, and I've never gotten below a 35 on math, but this time I ran out of time and had to guess on 2.</p>

<p>i put laser 2</p>

<p>then what were the choices for the n and t problem. I'll say them, cause i remember: </p>

<p>n increases, t increases little</p>

<p>t increases, n increases little</p>

<p>n and t increase alot</p>

<p>n decreases, and t increases</p>

<p>Anyone agree. i put n increases, and t increases little because and increase in t would result in lost of power. An increase in n must result in atleast a bit increase in t. there can't be an increase in t without an increase in n. The time t has to change little..... or there would be no reason to increase n, because the con of increasing t will cancel out the pro of increasing n. In this case, inorder to effiecently increase power/energy/watever, u must maintain t at about the same value while increasing n. thats why increasing both n and t is out of question. increasing both would be useless.... even by logic. and ofcourse, why would you decrease one of the variables... thats kind of like increasing n and t by alot, they cancel each other.</p>

<p>i put n and t increase a lot</p>