<p>
</p>
<p>But none of the documents mentioned the war guild cause…? How could you write the essay on that then…?</p>
<p>like 3 of them do (not directly), the only one i can remember is the cartoon</p>
<p>i think</p>
<p>The Clause can be considered “outside historical information,” or whatever CB calls it, RAlec. I incorporated quite a bit of information, in hopes that I can get that expanded core point. Heck, I even mentioned Bismarck a couple of times.</p>
<p>Would this grouping make any sense?
Socialist Contribution
Liberal Contribution
Nazi Contribution
to the fall of the republic
:/</p>
<p>if I used lets say 8 documents would that have been sufficient? What about 7? I really didn’t count how many i used. I used (at least I think) atleast 3 docs per paragraph, but i think i repeated once.</p>
<p>Well, technically, we can discuss the exam free-response section now.</p>
<p>my groups for the dbq were the presence of radical factions within the republic, the rise to power of hitler and the nazis, and the feeling of just wanting peace/being tired after the war which led citizens to not really fight the rise of hitler/radical factions. did anyone else do a grouping similar to my last one? i wasn’t sure if it was a legitimate group…kinda bs’d it at the last minute. and pov was really difficult! one of mine was that the guy had written his observations in a diary which i said proved that he wasn’t lying. ugh. mc was really easy though.</p>
<p>Would my groupings be ok if I used all but 1 of the docs, analyzed POV in 4 docs, and had 4 groupings? My groupings were Democratic Party, Social Democrat/Nazi Party, Writers/Novelists, and Women. I talked about what each group thought was wrong with the Weimar Republic.</p>
<p>What was the deal with that woman who praised the freedoms she had?</p>
<p>Wasn’t that basically a non-factor, as she failed to acknowledge that there was instability?</p>
<p>Can anyone help me remember the whole list of FRQs? (Or even just one or two…) As close as possible to the exact wording, please!</p>
<p><a href=“Supporting Students from Day One to Exam Day – AP Central | College Board”>Supporting Students from Day One to Exam Day – AP Central | College Board;
<p>for the women dbq, i wrote that there was biasism in her speech becasue she was blind folded by the instabiliy becasue of her granted sufferage, i jsut threw that out there</p>
<p>WOW the questions are already out !</p>
<p>I did these groups:</p>
<p>Nazis
People opposed to such sudden change
People with no belief in the Weimar Republic
People predicting/scared of a Marxist/proletariat revolution</p>
<p>I think I did 5 POV/Bias (Docs 3, 5, 7, 8, 11). I think I used all the documents (except maybe #4; I’m not sure if I used that one).</p>
<p>Do you think they will mark off for my prompt #3 because I only talked about Lutheran and Calvinism?</p>
<p>For prompt 3, I talked about the difference between Protestant tolerant states (England & France) versus non-tolerant ones (Spain & Holy Roman Empire). Is that good enough or did I totally screw it up?</p>
<p>Zhang, what did you talk about because I think I might have done the same. </p>
<p>I did:
- Luther - Peasant Revolt
- Luther - Papal Infallibility (Diet of Worms) + Calvin - Noble Elite
- Politiques - Henry of Navarre (Henry IV) + Elizabeth I</p>
<p>But the 3rd was pretty off-topic.</p>
<p>damn cant wait to get these back! wonder what i got</p>
<p>I cannot possibly wait until the third week of July for my scores. Oh, the pain. Oh, the agony. Oh, the cruel suffering!</p>
<p>I’m kind of baffled about the discussion of groups in this topic. The question basically asked one to analyze the factors (causes) of instability in the Weimar Republic.</p>
<p>I easily outlined an essay and decided to use these factors: Germans’ blame on politicians, the flaws of the Weimar constitution, political violence, and the rise of the Nazis.</p>
<p>I still can’t believe how hard those FRQ choices were. <em>Angrily mutters</em></p>