<p>I thought it was much harder than the last time I took it. (June 2012). I got a 31 on it last time, and I'd be ecstatic for a 28/29 this time. What does everyone else think?</p>
<p>I did pretty well to be honest. I skipped over the student vs student question because that’s the toughest part for me. When I came back to it, I had to guess on two questions because of time and just the sheer “toughness” of those questions.</p>
<p>I think the can and the four students’ thoughts on it was the hardest passage. So glad there weren’t any conflicting scientist viewpoints passages!!</p>
<p>what is the answer for the concentration difference between intracellualr and extracellualr? I put na+ but not so sure</p>
<p>I put whatever the one in the middle was, I think K+? </p>
<p>Overall, I thought it was easier than the science I took in October 2011. The student passage was much harder. I had a little trouble because I accidentally switched the frequencies of Dye G and Dye R so I had to go back and find the opposite of all my answers, that was so nerve-racking. But I think I did well. It was a true REASONING test this time around.</p>
<p>There was no conflicting viewpoints passage? Which passage had the 7 questions? Did they replace it with the 4 students passage?</p>
<p>I mean there was no passage with two scientists debating a certain topic. I guess you could count the 4 students as conflicting…</p>
<p>@michelle was the G dye the shorter one or the taller one? I’m still nervous about that.</p>
<p>G is the shorter one because accoding to the passage the G insinificant over 550</p>
<p>one the ion the na+ less 1/20 or 20 times. I’m confused by that one</p>
<p>I actually like the conflicting view points; I would have loved to have it rather than the 4 student passage. On the question on the kind of cell was it a skin cell?</p>
<p>neuron cell</p>
<p>Wow I feel stupid… neuron is nerve… smh. On the test I wasn’t thinking I guess.</p>
<p>There was a little (i) next to the elements for intracellular and a little (o) for extracellular.</p>
<p>It was actually explicitly stated in the passage.</p>
<p>Conflicting viewpoints recently has gone beyond 2 scientists. There are usually 4 viewpoints now to make things extra confusing for everybody.</p>
<p>yea i couldn’t believe my eyes when i saw 4 scientists views. double the trouble :(</p>