<p>The beaches are contaminated by sewage that lasts for several days</p>
<p>Is what I put I think</p>
<p>@seth</p>
<p>yup...she didn't want to be teased about joe (a.k.a. paper bags) so she married him which was out of character (answer to another question)</p>
<p>@gxing, that sounds familiar.</p>
<p>seth, the answer to that q was x > 3</p>
<p>Does anyone remember what the question was with the grid in answer of 5?</p>
<p>"The beaches are contaminated by sewage that lasts for several days</p>
<p>Is what I put I think"</p>
<p>i think the sentence was more complicated than that. the structure was different...</p>
<p>"The beaches are contaminated by sewage that lasts for several days
"</p>
<p>But that doesn't exactly say what lasts for several days. It could be that the beaches last for several days.</p>
<p>"seth, the answer to that q was x > 3"</p>
<p>How did you get that? I got that X^2>X, because (X-3)(X+2)=0, and -2 is not larger than 3.</p>
<p>no the answer to that quesiton was D</p>
<p>"ocean, while contamination lasted for several days"</p>
<p>I don't remember seeing "Spare" or "ornate" in any CR Sentence completions. Since I know what both of those mean, do you think they were the experimental? But I also had a CR experimental and still dont recall seeing those at all. </p>
<p>Also, which question was "Picayune" in? What about "harrowing"?</p>
<p>PLEASE HELP because I'm trying to decide whether or not to cancel.</p>
<p>Goldfish, since it immediately follows "sewage" it seems to be an indicator of what it is modifying</p>
<p>wow. x could have been -2 because (-2)^2 = (-2)+6</p>
<p>in that case...x^2 is still bigger than x because (-2)^2 > (-2)</p>
<p>was your essay on mistakes? it's funny, i thought no one was supposed to "discuss" the questions... well, so much for that.</p>
<p>I had spare and ornate.</p>
<p>Picayune was the one with picking out details in the play with the indelibile and moribund as choices.</p>
<p>picayune was the answer for minor details</p>
<p>and i think harrowing and disingenous were part of an experimental section because i didn't even see those words on my test</p>
<p>@karab</p>
<p>you needed the semicolon and clarification (with the beach problem)...otherwise it would have been ambigious</p>
<p>PS: It was X^2>X (even though I think I stupidly put the wrong thing)</p>
<p>X^2= 4 because X=-2 when I solved it. so -2^2=-2+6</p>
<p>equation worked</p>
<p>Spare/Ornate was about the writing style a teacher encouraged... question 5 or 6 in CR...</p>
<p>But "that lasts for several days" is a modifier, and since it directly follows sewage it is understood to modify sewage instead of beaches.</p>
<p>The beaches are contaminated with sewage; it lasts for several days</p>
<p>seems to add an independent clause for no reason</p>
<p>spare/ornate is correct. damnit 1 wrong for me in CR</p>
<p>hopefully 1 wrong in CR still equals 800.</p>
<p>it's not " ........... ; it lasts for several days" it's ".....; this contamination often last several days."</p>