<p>Why is the science scale so harsh? 
Well here’s to hoping that I only got 2 wrong.
When I already know I guessed on the last 3. And got another one wrong. Poooop</p>
<p>Based on the curves in the red book, the scores may vary as follows:</p>
<p>36: -0 or -1
35: -1 or -2
34: -1 or -3
33: -2 or -3 or -4
32: -4 or -5</p>
<p>@skylimits, the two times I took my ACT, I got -3 respectively, which ended up in a 34.</p>
<p>I put potential = kinetic + heat. Learned that years ago.</p>
<p>Can you get -1 and still get a 36?</p>
<p>EDIT: Just saw that this was answered.
Gives me hope.</p>
<p>The science section really sucks. If there’s one hard passage, everyone’s screwed except the kids who are just geniuses and would get a 40/40 no matter what. Because of them the curve isn’t always going to accomodate the kids like me who could get a 36 on some, but not all, science tests.</p>
<p>were the last two answers d and j??? please someone help</p>
<p>no Isubzero was 0.</p>
<p>anybody on the last 2?</p>
<p>I’m pretty sure #40 was J. Don’t know about 39</p>
<p>ok thankS! anbyody else on the last 2?</p>
<p>Didn’t get a chance to read the last passage… How many bs were in the last one?</p>
<p>Does anyone remember 200 for an answer
0 0
This experiment had direct reacts number 2 didn’t ?</p>
<p>@largeblackguy
How was I subzero 0, shouldn’t it be 8000?</p>
<p>anbyody on the last 2?/??</p>
<p>I guessed, lol. So your probably right–Did yall get as length increased, cpm decreased?</p>
<p>Has anyone noticed the ACT Test Makers stopped putting solubility graphs as questions. Those were so easy… did they remove it because everyone got them right???</p>
<p>Does anyone remember the last 5 answers?</p>
<p>Question about as thickness increased did the gamma rays increas/decrease and why. Somthing like that?</p>
<p>Yeah I put rays decreased. Was that right?</p>