<p>Ok 48 is also correct. I don’t remember the actual function but I graphed it and 9.7 was the greater x-value of the two.</p>
<p>i’m assuming it was correct…do you know what the question was though?</p>
<p>It was the “greatest x-value” of the intersection of two functions. I don’t remember the first one, but hte other one was y=6. The functinos intersected at (-9.7, 6) and (9.7, 6) so the answer is 9.7.</p>
<p>Niceboat, I know it doesn’t really matter, but for 38, I’m pretty sure the variables were x and y, not a and b.</p>
<p>alright everyone, good night, and good luck with your results. pm me if you have any queries</p>
<p>increasing functions just ones that keep going up as x → infinity, right? so then that’s how 2^x and the positive slope line work since 1/2^x approaches 0 (decreases)</p>
<p>i also got 9.7! i ended up plugging in y=6 into the other equation and solved for x^2 = 94. hope that was the correct answer.</p>
<p>man, i should really start studying for finals, finish my various projects, and all that jazz, but i can’t stop trying to figure out my score :B IT IS WHAT IT IS, GUYS. we’ll find out what they were looking for in the intersecting spheres and 5-polynomial questions and all those other crazy ambiguous ones once we get our scores back in a couple weeks.</p>
<p>good luck to everyone!!</p>
<p>I got bpi as the answer to the tan question… Didn’t you have to set 2b equal to pi/2 and 3pi/2 and take the difference?</p>
<p>what do you guys think a raw score of 35 would get one on this test?</p>
<p>@houstonrep</p>
<p>probably a 720, 730</p>
<p>so far out of the ones i remember i got 2 wrong how many more can i get wrong (i didn’t skip any) and still get an 800</p>
<p>Assuming curve is standard 44, 3 more wrong.</p>
<p>3 points were (0,0) (-3,2) and (3,2)</p>
<p>Are you sure 43 was the one that looked like a cubed function? I thought it was the parabolic one.</p>
<p>Im pretty sure i got like at most 3 to 4 wrong with no skips. Is that always a 800?</p>
<p>The function that has an inverse function was the cubed function as it’s the only one that passed the horizontal line test.</p>
<p>I messed up the coslaw and put 67 degrees for some reason because I though it was acute…
Damn.</p>
<p>I’m talking about a different question, the one where f(0)=f(6).</p>
<p>For 42. I’m pretty sure The negative t squared was the different one.</p>
<p>Oh, no it was the cubed one. The parabolic one was close, but f(0) was clearly greater than f(6) and the vertex wasn’t at x=3, it appeared to be at x=4.</p>
<p>Just realized the parametric equation question could be solved with the trig identities by squaring both equations and adding them. huh.</p>
<p>what would a raw score of 35-36 be?</p>