<p>The immigration graph one...what were the anwsers to that, i can't even remember what i put down for it.</p>
<p>What was Hamilton's clause he used to justify the bank?</p>
<p>congregationalist was government had little distinction btwn church and state, right?</p>
<p>i'm pretty sure new lights were emotional because the old lights disapproved of the passionate revivals with people rolling in the walkways with religious ecstasy or something like that</p>
<p>elastic for hamilton</p>
<p>less immigration during wars</p>
<p>drflet- this weather is insane, don't you think? I think only people in colorado consider it "insane" when it rains for two days, but what can i say- it's weird!</p>
<p>marshall plan was economic recovery for europe.
for the photo I put domestic duties also.</p>
<p>what was that other photo one, with the house? That one confused the heck out of me.</p>
<p>hamilton used the clasue of implied and necessary rights</p>
<p>What did you all get on practice tests? I got 720's and 730's consistently on the sparknotes but I thought this test was way harder than any of the ones in that book. How 'bout you guys?</p>
<p>What was the difference between AFL and KoL? I can't believe I forgot this one...</p>
<p>Hamilton justified the bank with the necessary and proper clause.</p>
<p>no the 2nd great awakening dealt with emotional issues, and new lights were with the first awakening...</p>
<p>Hamilton was the neccessary and proper clause</p>
<p>vegangirl- I miss the sunshine. But everything is nice and green.</p>
<p>The house was something about the financial wellbeing about the owners.</p>
<p>was an answer like people moved to the sunbelt???</p>
<p>for the difference between AFL and knights of labor I put that the AFL fought for economic issues...but I wasn't entirely sure.</p>
<p>oh yeah vegan girl I'm vegan too...we're awsome</p>
<p>haha </p>
<p>YAY VEGANS!</p>
<p>Photo one I put that the rich Americans wanted to be acciociated with the European Aristocracy because the time period was the late 19th century ( I believe) and because none of the others really seemed to fit, I figured the robber barrons liked to look... royal?</p>
<p>what was the difference between AFL and Knights of Labor? was it the strike or the economic vs. political reasoning?</p>
<p>dan- the question was like, "what area experienced a large population growth in the '70s and '80s?" right? and i think the sunbelt was right.</p>
<p>i dont remeber this congregationalist question can some1 rephrase the question for me</p>
<p>oh yeah the 1975-1985 one was hard...i guessed ( igot rid of 3 anwsers) and putthe moving to big cities...i had no clue!</p>
<p>AFL had unskilled and skilled laborers, unlikeother unions</p>
<p>i put 3,5,7,8 because russia was 9 and definitely was on the us' side in wwi.</p>
<p>i was so surprised at the easiness, especially since everyoen said that the SAT II was harder than the ap.</p>
<p>no the Knights of Labor had unskilled and skilled workers...which is why they failed as a union (also with the haymarket bombing)</p>
<p>the AFL was very restrictive of who they let in ...like only skilled workers</p>