***OFFICIAL MAY 2015 SAT THREAD (US ONLY)***

was the writing question with “collaborate” in the experimental section or the real one?

m^9

Does anyone remember what you guys put for the conditions for the median one with 66? I said all of them.

Also does anyone remember the one the guy thought video games weren’t an art would least likely say this about video games? I put profound.

My experimental was about gdp and energy companies. It had a graph in it, so I know it was an experimental.

It was the real one. I said collaborate was wrong because they might have used the wrong word and instead corroborate was the appropriate word

the answer for the parks writing question was “park an” but was that choice a? does anyone remember?

@APChemIsEasy I said none of them because 66 was the median, not the average.

I almost put x-3, but if you checked the labels on the x axis it started at 16, there was a break in the graph… Didn’t start at 0. Went from 16-24; would’ve been x-3 if the axis started at 0 in the figure though. Tricky

What was the answer to the park question… Was he choices with being in them wrong?

11

for that writing question with the artists, was it something like they did not want to ignore the critics or something?

what do we think -3 -4 -5 writing will be with a 12?

DID THE MATH EXPERIMENTAL HAVE 10000 CHARTS AND QUESTIONS ABOUT FISH LENGTHS AND A 4 IN LONG PARAGRAPH ON SOMETHING LIKE ELECTRICITY? HLP Plz

@biofreak99 I don’t know what goes wrong every time I try to direct myself to the link !! It again didn’t work …

I put all of them for the math problem with the median as 66.

@rsohn12 the question was something like “park it being an additional problem”?? something like that. I think the answer was just “park” not “park as”

wrong its a median and i m sure it said MUST BE

My 2nd and 3rd sections were both math, but the first one was a lot harder and had no grid in? Was it experimental? D:

btw the international test and us test overlapped somewhat

There was one experimental CR section that was like interpreting scientific literature, I was so done. My essay was pretty good though.