<p>53 was the answer. not 59. 10pi was answer. and my question is... is it .4%? I was dying on this quesiton.</p>
<p>And did someone have a question about two cities (kansas city and something else)? I put 1.5..... and was worrying.</p>
<p>53 was the answer. not 59. 10pi was answer. and my question is... is it .4%? I was dying on this quesiton.</p>
<p>And did someone have a question about two cities (kansas city and something else)? I put 1.5..... and was worrying.</p>
<p>did anyone get the cube answer? where it had all those mini cubes</p>
<p>i got .4% as well</p>
<p>i second 53</p>
<p>didnt have knot one.. experimental probs</p>
<p>.4 just seemed way to easy imo.. but i put it. Rest of math was simple
4X was the answer to direct proportion iirc. did anyone have anything about 2 cities and 1.5 as an answer?</p>
<p>4x is correct. i didn't get a cities question though.</p>
<p>anybody have the grid in where you had to find the length of OA given that the slope of line AB was between .5 and .55? there was an accompanying graph to it.</p>
<p>4.06?
i got 4 not 4x... check it</p>
<p>I had 68 on the cube question, I think it was choice D</p>
<p>it was 1.9 < x < 2.0 avant. I set up inequalities and stuff to do it.</p>
<p>if anyone wants to chat on aim .. my sn is xonicole143ox</p>
<p>The cube one is 70.</p>
<p>what cube one?????</p>
<p>It's looking like there were multiple tests. The cube one was with the blocks being stacked to 1, 2, 3, and then you had to find the number in the 4th level.</p>
<p>def didnt have that one..</p>
<p>it could be experimental</p>
<p>That stupid cube one, I lost time on it working out some other problem, there was a formula right?</p>
<p>No it wasn't experimental cause I had an extra full length writing section, which means my experimental was writing right?</p>
<p>I don't know about a formula but I just found there was a pattern. The first increment was 10, the second 21. There were 5 * 2, then 7 * 3, so then I saw the 4th would be 9 * 4 = 36. 36+34 = 70.</p>
<p>anyone remember the one with n, b, c, and x. It said solve for c in terms of b or something like that. Was that one experimental?</p>
<p>noo that wasn't</p>
<p>and how is 53 the answer and not 59</p>