<p>Is it possible to get 1-2 wrong for the cr and still get an 800 on this curve?</p>
<p>For the city/ecology passage, the three levels were "arguments in support of the fundamental" theme.</p>
<p>fundamnetal reasons. They were all reasons...he wasn't coming to any "conclusion". It was more like he was just giving you the various reasons about "urban ecology".</p>
<p>longislander-yup!</p>
<p>sum33th... do you mean the question toward the end that asked about the second to last paragraph? I think I put something like he used reasoning to back up his claim</p>
<p>Also, what was the ending for the city passage? I thought it emphasized the author's position. That made more sense than "summarizing".</p>
<p>it emphasized</p>
<p>yes mahras!! fundamental claims.. definitely</p>
<p>do you guys remember the vocab words that were the right answer?
i totally spaced and didn't know the answers for the question with pedantic and the next question after that....yeahh. anyone remember?</p>
<p>anyone wanna talk about that relationship and ties question? btw it was definitely nations, not countries (if that make any difference).</p>
<p>uh oh.. I put summarize because it's more specific and he really did summarize all the little details into two sentences. Two sentences usually don't emphasize</p>
<p>definitely emphasized because for the other choice it said, "summarized all the EVIDENCE."</p>
<p>I put emphasized. The italics should have hinted you there as well.</p>
<p>but didn't it summarize all the evidence??</p>
<p>so for Mona Lisa, how many said mouth over profile?</p>
<p>i put mouth</p>
<p>on the controversial nations questions (lol): I put that the essay was on "an ongoing relationship that was significant". They weren't really talking about any two particular nations.</p>
<p>is it possible to have two wrong answers and still get an 800? Thank you and good luck to all.</p>
<p>oh **** that's right.. ITALICS! ARGHHH</p>
<p>i put mouth as well</p>