<p>does anyone remember getting 3.1 as their answer to one of the grid-ins???</p>
<p>It was the question right before the 47*53 one.</p>
<p>sqrt 29, 47*53, yea... it was definitely sqrt 29... 3.1? i forget... what was the problem?</p>
<p>yes, i'm wierd</p>
<p>yeah luckyduckyther, that writing question bugged me also, I selected "concentrated in" as you did. I thought that concentrated need a helping verb to fit the "participle" guidelines</p>
<p>it was the on the grid-ins and im pretty sure i got it right but it seems like there was no answer such as 3.1?</p>
<p>it was bent and analyzed
what about the question where they asked for psychological reality or something... i dont remember many of hte questions in that passage</p>
<p>and girlfriendmb, isn't seeing the same exact problems a "good" thing....I dont understand your logic</p>
<p>i don't remember a 3.1</p>
<p>For that air pollutants question, I put no error.</p>
<br>
<blockquote> <p>xeal same i put no error...</p> </blockquote>
<br>
<p>gameguy: one of the grid ins was 3.5 i belive..</p>
<p>if someone explains what this 3.1 problem is, we can work it out... but i don't remember it</p>
<p>pollutants was dumb... i had no error, but then i went back and changed it to "them" because it sounded bad, but when they have sentences in which the ENTIRE THING is poorly worded, it's usually correct. which is bad. cuz i'd never use a sentence like that ever. ever</p>
<p>For MLK question, what does "suffered" mean?
overproduction and misuse that it suffered since his death.....</p>
<p>I put endured</p>
<p>yeah, i got a 3.5 as a grid in problem. it was the one w/ the complicated absolute value inequality. i think 3.1 would work too. can i get some confirmation</p>
<p>and, i missed 1 problem... well, i left it blank on the math section. is this potentially an 800????</p>
<p>I hated the Cecile and MLK passages. I put "cynical" disagreement or somethin for the MLK. Cecile, I put "regrettably underhanded." The 2nd MLK passage was incomprehensible to me. I couldn't tell *** it was trying to say as its main point, or any point for that matter.</p>
<p>I ended up getting 4 NO ERRORS for the writing section. That seems a bit excessive, but I couldn't find anything wrong with them. The pollution one, the mythology one, and 2 more.</p>
<p>no, i don't believe so. if you have one omit, your potentiall score is very likely to be 790</p>
<p>i put endured as well for the MLK "suffered"</p>
<p>put no error for the pollutant question</p>
<p>for the math with 3.5 answer (which is what i put) i think the question was in the line of
6</X-3/<7 and X<0 what is one possible answer for /X/?</p>
<p>crap...if the firetruck one is real, my math is down the drain....at least -3 now... </p>
<p>does anyone think i can get higher than 710 with -3 this time around?</p>
<p>For the sentence error id part, did you have quite many "no errors"? what is the answer for the greek mythology one, it's something like ...when both poets and philosiphers turned to mythology for subject matter, i put no error</p>
<p>i put endured</p>