<p>did we ever settle the </p>
<p>"complete agreement/cautiously optimistic" </p>
<p>arguement?
i got cautiously optimistic</p>
<p>what about the one where it was (x-y)(x+y)=?</p>
<p>was the answer to that II or I II and III?</p>
<p>i dont get how you did that, can you explain further the area 35 one</p>
<p>cautiously optimistic? Explain. I put "complete agreement" but am no genious.</p>
<p>i put complete agreement as well</p>
<p>George, long time no see, lol.</p>
<p>100% positive it was bent, analyzed.</p>
<p>The answer was (2x)^y)((2x)^2y - 1)))</p>
<p>I got both reassured and simplistic...but I didn't get "complete agreement" (I am very skeptical about my answer of "cynical" disagreement or something to that nature).</p>
<p>I am not sure what I put on that writing question. I think it was "and since then has lived in North London."</p>
<p>i dont remember the whole problem but I just know the structure of it..the answer choices were like</p>
<p>a. I only
b. II only
c. III only
d. II and III only
e. I and III only</p>
<p>something like that?? remember?</p>
<p>Also, what was the answer to the last problem on Sec.9 math? was it 0? </p>
<p>the problem was something like 1+ 1/x = and there was a symbol.</p>
<p>georges-</p>
<p>i thought the second paragraph was saying that peole blindly praised MLK. the quote was saying that MLK was more than a dreamer and that he was a...blahblahblah.</p>
<p>so i thought that the second paragraph person would see it as more of "oh, it's actually going in depth and discussing other topics than "i have a dream." but i didn't think it was a COMPLETE agreement.</p>
<p>yes. because max area is in right triangle, and you want the two known numbers to be the smallest sides, becaues you ahve to multiply the two smallest sides in a right tri. and div. by 2 to get area, and you want the two smalles sides to be the biggest to max. area, and that only happens when the other side, x, is bigger.</p>
<p>Gameguy...the answer was B (II only).</p>
<p>The x+1/x answer was t = -2.</p>
<p>what did you get for the one with the isosceles triangle...it wanted to know the length of the base? I think i put 8 but i'm not sure.</p>
<p>no way????? Man i suck.... i had like 1 minute to solve that last problem and I accidentally added -1+1 instead of -1-1......:( COST ME 10-20 POINTS!</p>
<p>x+1/x problem was -2 (-1+1/-1) - however, one problem i thought was tricky was the one taht was f(x)=x/(x+1), and then, what does f(2) x f(3) equal. i was trying to figure it out, and i had no idea what the "x" was between the 2 functions (i'm in multi var calc... cross product? ***? some crazy alg. 1 thing i don't know?) then i realized it was multiplying, but that didn't help me, because it was 6/12, which wasn't any of the answers... except 6/12 is 1/2, which was the first answer. i realized taht w/ 2 seconds left. i was sooo happy.</p>
<p>anyway, yeah. MLK passages sucked hard. so poorly written, and the authors kept switching opinions and it sucked a whole lot.</p>
<p>and the essay topic, although easy, was really lame. anyone agree? LAMENESS?</p>
<p>It was kind of hard for me to build on good examples :(</p>
<p>god i hate the essay topics</p>
<p>for march last year, they were like:</p>
<p>majority rule. go.</p>
<p>what is THAT?!</p>
<p>isaac newton, lance armstrong, and potential death of society if we fully embrace luck as sole reason to success. i wrote that it was a subtle combination.</p>
<p>i was hoping to write an interesting and awesome essay going hardcore into philosophy, a subject about which a know far too much for my own good. </p>
<p>PLATO IS MY HOMEBOY</p>
<p>yeah, basically i thought the entire thing sucked pretty much...my proctor wouldnt even say 5 mins left....loser</p>
<p>majority rule, i had that one. that was fun. i wrote about a crazy post-modern philosophyer, and holocaust or something</p>
<p>it was more interesting and critical at least in terms of thought</p>
<p>does an essay without a conclusion hurt my essay score significantly?</p>
<p>And is it a known fact that a section can only be experimental if it is an extra one and appears only in one form? so is it true that there is no way that section 5 (the firetruck) could be experimental?</p>
<p>i had 4 writing sections but no nixon. Was the string theory passage experimental?</p>